PT - JOURNAL ARTICLE AU - Cameron C Grant AU - Nikki M Turner AU - Deon G York AU - Felicity Goodyear-Smith AU - Helen A Petousis-Harris TI - Factors associated with immunisation coverage and timeliness in New Zealand AID - 10.3399/bjgp10X483535 DP - 2010 Mar 01 TA - British Journal of General Practice PG - e113--e120 VI - 60 IP - 572 4099 - http://bjgp.org/content/60/572/e113.short 4100 - http://bjgp.org/content/60/572/e113.full SO - Br J Gen Pract2010 Mar 01; 60 AB - Background Immunisation coverage in New Zealand is lower than what is necessary to prevent large epidemics of pertussis. Primary care is where most immunisation delivery occurs. General practices vary in their structure and organisation, both in a general sense and specifically with respect to immunisation delivery.Aim To identify the structural and organisational characteristics of general practices associated with higher immunisation coverage and more timely immunisation delivery.Design of study A random sample of practices during 2005 and 2006.Setting General practices in the Auckland and Midland regions, with over-sampling of indigenous Maori governance practices.Method Practice immunisation coverage and timeliness were measured. Primary care practice characteristics relevant to immunisation delivery by the practice were described. Associations of these practice characteristics with higher practice immunisation coverage and more timely immunisation delivery were determined.Results A total of 124 (61%) of 205 eligible practices were recruited. A median (25th to 75th centile) of 71% (57–77%) of registered children at each practice were fully immunised, and 56% (40–64%) had no immunisation delay. In multivariate analyses, both practice immunisation coverage (P<0.001) and timeliness (P<0.001) decreased with increased social deprivation. After adjustment for socioeconomic deprivation, region, and governance, immunisation coverage and timeliness were better at practices that enrolled children at a younger age (coverage: P = 0.002; timeliness P = 0.007), used one of the four available practice management systems (coverage: P<0.001; timeliness: P = 0.006), and had no staff shortages (coverage: P = 0.027; timeliness: P = 0.021).Conclusion Practice immunisation coverage and timeliness vary widely in New Zealand. General organisational and structural aspects of general practices are key determinants of general practice immunisation delivery.