Table 4.

Mean change in WOMAC score and change in K/L distribution between baseline (T0) and 2-year follow up (T2)a

Knee pain at baselineHip pain at baseline
TKA−TKA+THA−THA+
VariableT0–T2 (n= 732)T0–T2 (n= 18)P-value mean ΔT0–T2 (n= 485)T0–T2 (n= 40)P-value mean Δ
WOMAC pain−1.7 (0.6)4.4 (3.5)0.12b−1.2 (0.8)4.7 (2.7)0.04b
WOMAC physical function−1.3 (0.5)4.9 (4.8)0.07b−1.1 (0.7)3.0 (2.1)0.10b
Distribution of K/L score 0/1/2/3/4 (%)T0
T2
1479 knees
61/39/0/0/0
50/36/13/1/0
21 knees
14/86/0/0/0
5/15/55/20/5
<0.01c1002 hips
74/26/0/0/0
68/30/2/0/0
48 hips
28/72/0/0/0
23/23/35/14/5
<0.01c
  • a Values are mean change between T0 and T2 (standard error), or percentages %. P-values obtained with

  • b Student’s t-test or

  • c generalised estimating equations (GEE) and indicate whether the change in mean values (Δ) or in distribution of K/L score differ significantly. Progression of K/L score adjusted for baseline K/L score. K/L = Kellgren and Lawrence. T0 = baseline. T2 = 2-year follow-up. THA = total hip arthroplasty. TKA = total knee arthroplasty. WOMAC = Western Ontario and McMaster osteoarthritis index.