Skip to main content
Log in

The discussion of end-of-life medical care by primary care patients and physicians

A multicenter study using structured qualitative interviews

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives: To identify primary care patients’ and physicians’ beliefs, attitudes, preferences, and expectations regarding discussions of end-of-life medical care, and to identify factors limiting the quality and frequency of these discussions.

Design: Descriptive study using audiotaped, structured, qualitative interviews.

Setting: Ambulatory care clinics and offices at eight medical centers in six states.

Participants: Forty-three primary care physicians and 47 ambulatory outpatients.

Results: The patients expressed strong feelings about having end-of-life discussions early in their medical courses while they were competent. They desired straightforward and honest discussions and were less concerned than the physicians about damaging hope. The patients wanted their physicians to play central roles in discussions and both the patients and the physicians noted the impact of the patient-physician relationship on these discussions. The patients desired information focusing more on expected outcomes than on medical processes. The physicians expressed feelings of ambiguity when their desire to save lives clashed with their belief that aggressive life-sustaining treatments were futile. The physicians described their roles in end-of-life discussions in five major categories: lifesaver, neutral scientist, guide, counselor, and intimate confidant. The physicians considered living wills excellent “icebreakers” for starting discussions but of limited utility otherwise.

Conclusions: Patients prefer end-of-life discussions earlier and with greater honesty than physicians may perceive. These discussions are inseparably linked with the patient-physician relationship. Physicians can better address patients’ desires in end-of-life discussions by altering their timing, content, and delivery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shmerling RH, Bedell SE, Lilienfeld A, Delbanco TL. Discussing cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a study of elderly outpatients. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:317–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Stolman CJ, Gregory JJ, Dunn D, Levine JL. Evaluation of patient, physician, nurse, and family attitudes toward do not resuscitate orders. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:653–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Finucane TE, Shumway JM, Powers RL, D’Alessandri RM. Planning with elderly outpatients for contingencies of severe illness: a survey and clinical trial. J Gen Intern Med. 1988;3:322–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Frankl D, Oye RK, Bellamy PE. Attitudes of hospitalized patients toward life support: a survey of 200 medical inpatients. Am J Med. 1989;86:645–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ebell MH, Smith MA, Seifert KG, Polsinelli K. The do-not-resuscitate order: outpatient experience and decision-making preferences. J Fam Pract. 1990;31:630–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. McDowell I, Newell C. Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires. New York: Oxford University Press, 1987; 18, 212, 235–9.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karnofsky DA, Abelman WH, Craver LF, Burchenal JH. The use of the nitrogen mustards in the palliative treatment of carcinoma. Cancer. 1948;1:634–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Schain WS. Physician-patient communication about breast cancer. Surg Clin North Am. 1990;70:917–35.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thome SE, Robinson CA. Guarded alliance: health care relationships in chronic illness. IMAGE: J Nurs Scholar. 1989;21:153–7.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Soukhanov AH (ed). Webster’s II New Riverside University Dictionary. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1984;639.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Suchman AL, Matthews DA. What makes the patient-doctor relationship therapeutic? Exploring the connexional dimension of medical care. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:125–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith AC, Kleinman S. Managing emotions in medical school: students’ contacts with the living and the dead. Social Psychol Q. 1989;52:56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Haas J, Shaffir W. The professionalization of medical students: developing competence and a cloak of competence. Symbolic Interaction. 1977;1:71–88.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Additional information

The EOL Study Group is based at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill. Its members include Harold M. Adelman, MD, and Paul M. Wallach, MD, University of South Florida, Tampa; Joseph F. Boero, MD, University of Illinois at Rockford; Dennis Crnkovich, MD, University of Illinois at Peoria; Kevin A. Halbritter, MD, West Virginia University, Morgantown; Sarah Johnston, MD, University of Kansas at Wichita; Rita Layson, MD, University of North Carolina-Greensboro; Mary E. O’Brien, MD, University of North Carolina-Wilmington; Mark P. Pfeifer, MD, University of Louisville, Kentucky; Jaan E. Sidorov, MD, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, Pennsylvania; and Allen C. Smith, PhD, Arthur T. Evans, MD, MPH, Miriam B. Settle, PhD, and Robert A. McNutt, MD, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill.

Supported in part by grants from the Public Health Service, Bureau of Health Professions (#5 D28 PE 54004-08), the Geisinger Medical Center in Danville, PA, the Moses Cone Hospital in Greensboro, NC, and the University of Kansas-Wichita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pfeifer, M.P., Sidorov, J.E., Smith, A.C. et al. The discussion of end-of-life medical care by primary care patients and physicians. J Gen Intern Med 9, 82–88 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600206

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02600206

Key words

Navigation