Elsevier

Social Science & Medicine

Volume 47, Issue 10, November 1998, Pages 1573-1588
Social Science & Medicine

A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(98)00222-6Get rights and content

Abstract

To make health care more responsive to patient needs, insight into patient priorities is needed. A systematic literature review, using electronic and manual searches, was made of studies on patient priorities with regard to primary health care. Data-extraction was performed by two researchers, followed by systematic analyses of study features. 57 studies were included. The aspects of care and methods used showed a wide variation. Aspects most often included were “informativeness”, “humaneness” and “competence/accuracy”. Based on an analysis of 19 studies, the following aspects were seen by patients as most important in more than 50% of the studies that included them: “humaneness”, “competence/accuracy”, “patients' involvement in decisions”, “time for care”, “other aspects of availability/accessibility”, “informativeness”, “exploring patients' needs”, “other aspects of relation and communication” and “availability of special services”.

Introduction

Patients can offer valuable contributions to the improvement of health care. They can be definers of good quality, evaluators of health care delivery and reporters of their experiences (Donabedian, 1992). As participants in health care delivery, they can influence the quality of care in more direct ways as well, for example by means of involvement in decisions concerning medical treatment. So it is important to know which aspects of care are important for patients and which aspects are less important. This knowledge helps health care providers to set priorities in their efforts to make health care more responsive to patients' wants and needs. Furthermore, using patients' perspectives for assessing the quality of care focuses on aspects that proved to be important for patients. A literature review of patient satisfaction studies in primary care showed that patients were rarely involved in the selection of indicators (Wensing et al., 1994). Therefore valid and reliable documentation is needed of the importance of different aspects of health care from patients' point of view.

Priorities can be defined as statements that indicate the importance of specific aspects of clinical behavior of care providers or the organization of care. Priorities are “normative expectations”: ideas about what should or ought to happen (Thompson and Sunol, 1995). Patient priorities differ from their reported experiences and from their satisfaction ratings with care delivery (Kaplan and Ware, 1989). Reported experiences are perceptions of actual events or episodes of care, such as the number of health check-ups in the last year. Satisfaction expresses an evaluation of actual experiences for which expectations or priorities are a frame of reference.

Studies on patient priorities have been published in many different sources, including health care and social science journals. We decided to make a systematic literature review of these studies. To the authors' knowledge, this is the first systematic literature review in this research field. It focuses on primary care, since this review is part of a large international study on patient priorities and evaluations concerning the quality of general practice care, called EUROPEP (Grol, 1993). Primary care was defined “the provision of integrated, accessible health care services by clinicians who are accountable for addressing a large majority of personal health care needs, developing a sustained partnership with patients and participating in the context of family and community” (Donaldson et al., 1994).

The following research questions were formulated:

⋅ Which aspects of care have been included and which research methods have been used in studies on patient priorities with regard to primary health care or health care in general?

⋅ Which aspects of care are seen by patients as important for the quality of primary health care?

Section snippets

Literature search and inclusion

In order to find studies we applied several systematic search strategies: (1) computerized searches in Medline (1966–September 1995), Psychlit (1977–June 1995) and Sociofile (1974–August 1995), using the keywords “patient” or “consumer” combined with “expectation”, “priority” or “preference” and combined with “care” (“primary health care” in Medline). (2) We searched 30 international scientific journals for health care, general practice or family medicine care manually (1980–September 1995),

Results

In sum 57 studies met our inclusion criteria (marked with an asterisk in the reference list). Most studies were carried out in the U.S.A. (29 studies) or the United Kingdom (11 studies). The other studies were from Australia (6 studies), the Netherlands (4 studies), Canada (2 studies) or other countries (5 studies). Most studies were focused on general/family practice, either office-based (31 studies) or hospital-based (4 studies). Three studies concentrated on other primary care providers. The

Discussion

An overview has been provided of 57 studies on patient priorities with regard to primary care or health care in general, which are patients' subjective standards for good quality of care. It revealed a wide variation in the methodology and aspects of care included, which made it difficult to compare the results of different studies. The overall importance rank-order, based on an analysis of 19 studies, suggested that both technical and interpersonal quality are important for patients. In

References (67)

  • G.C. Pascoe

    Patient satisfaction in primary health care: a literature review and analysis

    Evaluation and Program Planning

    (1983)
  • M. Wensing et al.

    Quality judgements by patients on general practice care: a literature analysis

    Social Science and Medicine

    (1994)
  • M.M. Al-Bashir et al.

    Preferences of healthy and ill patients for style of general practitioner care: implications for workload and financial incentives under the new contract

    British Journal of General Practice

    (1991)
  • D. Allen et al.

    Survey of patients' satisfaction with access to general practitioners

    Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

    (1988)
  • S.S. Allen et al.

    Preferences and opinions of consumers vs dietitians on cholestorol education materials

    Journal of the American Dietitic Association

    (1991)
  • T. Anvik

    Doctors in a white coat: what do patients think and what do doctors do?

    Scandinavian Journal of Primary Health Care

    (1990)
  • L. Bartholomew et al.

    Attitudes of patients towards family care in a family practice group

    Journal of Family Practice

    (1982)
  • P. Bendtsen et al.

    Perceived needs and patient satisfaction in relation to care provided in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis

    Quality Assurance in Health Care

    (1993)
  • L.M. Buckley et al.

    Educational and psychological needs of patients with chronic disease. A survey of preferences of patients with rheumatoid arthritis

    Arthritis Care and Research

    (1990)
  • T. Caradoc-Davies

    Rehabilitation services in the health sector: the perspectives of providers and consumers. Part 2

    New Zealand Medical Journal

    (1995)
  • N. Cartwright et al.

    Patients' preferences for appointment times

    British Medical Journal

    (1990)
  • C.A. Chew et al.

    Annual assessments of patients aged 75 years and over: views and experiences of elderly people

    British Journal of General Practice

    (1994)
  • J. Cockburn et al.

    Preferences of rural Victorian women for screening mammography services

    Australian Journal of Public Health

    (1992)
  • L.E. Cosler et al.

    Consumer preference for personal drug information source: relationship to perceived importance of drug class

    Drug Intelligence and Clinical Pharmacy

    (1986)
  • S.E. Curtis

    The patients' view of general practice in an urban area

    Family Practice

    (1987)
  • Y. Cymbalist et al.

    Patient attitudes to general practice services. A rural experience

    Australian Family Physician

    (1988)
  • L.F. Degner et al.

    Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play?

    Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

    (1992)
  • A. Donabedian

    Quality assurance in health care: consumers' role

    Quality in Health Care

    (1992)
  • Donaldson, M., Yordy, K. and Vanselow, N. (eds.) (1994) Defining Primary Care: An Interim Report. Institute of...
  • J.A. Druley et al.

    Physicians' predictions of elderly outpatients' preferences for life sustaining treatment

    Journal of Family Practice

    (1993)
  • M. Drury et al.

    A nurse practitioner in general practice: patient perceptions and expectations

    Journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners

    (1988)
  • J.I. Elstad

    Women's priorities regarding physician behavior and their preference for a female physician

    Women and Health

    (1994)
  • J. Ende et al.

    Measuring patients' desire for autonomy: Decision making and information-seeking preferences among medical patients

    Journal of General Internal Medicine

    (1989)
  • K. Fennema et al.

    Sex of physician: patients' preferences and stereotypes

    Journal of Family Practice

    (1990)
  • G. Fishman et al.

    How to satisfy patients and compete with the entrepreneurs

    Australian Family Physician

    (1987)
  • R.H. Fletcher et al.

    Patients' priorities of medical care

    Medical Care

    (1983)
  • J.Y. Greene et al.

    Patient attitudes toward health care: expectations of primary care in a clinic setting

    Social Science and Medicine

    (1980)
  • Groen, B., Willemse, N. and Rijkschroeff, R. (1991) Op zoek naar kwaliteitscriteria van de eerstelijnsgezondheidszorg...
  • Grol, R. (1993) Development and validation of an European standardised outcome instrument for patient evaluation of the...
  • E. Hagman et al.

    Priorities in primary health care

    Scandinavian Journal of Primary Care

    (1985)
  • T. Hares et al.

    Diabetes care: who are the experts?

    Quality in Health Care

    (1992)
  • C.J. Heaton et al.

    Patient preferences for physician gender in the male genital/rectal exam

    Family Practice Research Journal

    (1990)
  • J.L. Hopton et al.

    Patients' perceptions of need for primary health care services: useful for priority setting?

    British Medical Journal

    (1995)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text