Elsevier

European Journal of Cancer

Volume 39, Issue 15, October 2003, Pages 2214-2222
European Journal of Cancer

Differences in colorectal cancer survival between European and US populations: the importance of sub-site and morphology

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0959-8049(03)00549-5Get rights and content

Abstract

A previous study has shown a lower survival for colorectal cancer in Europe than in the United States of America (USA). It is of interest to examine the extent to which anatomical location and morphological type influence this difference in colorectal cancer survival. We analysed survival for 151 244 European and 53 884 US patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer aged 15–99 years during the period of 1985–1989, obtained from 40 cancer registries that contribute to the EUROCARE study from 17 countries, and nine Surveillance, Epidemiology and End-Results (SEER) registries in the USA. Cases included in the analysis were first primary malignant tumours (ICD-O behaviour code 3 or higher). Relative survival was estimated to correct for competing causes of mortality. The Hakulinen–Tenkanen multiple regression approach was used to examine the prognostic impact of sub-site and ICD-O histology codes. Relative excess risks (RERs) derived from this approach estimate the extent to which the hazard of death differs from that in a reference region after adjustment for mortality in the general population. In order to explore geographical variation, we defined three groups of European registries within which survival rates were known to be broadly similar. The proportion of cases with unspecified sub-site was higher in Europe than the USA (10% versus 2%), but sub-site distributions were broadly similar in the two populations. With the exception of appendix, 5-year survival was 13–22% higher in the USA than in Europe for each anatomical sub-site. The proportion of non-microscopically-verified cases was higher in Europe than the USA (16 versus 3%). Adenocarcinomas arising in a polyp (ICD-O-2 8210, 8261, 8263) were more frequent in the USA than Europe (13 versus 2%). Five-year survival was higher in the USA than Europe for each morphological group, with the exception of non-microscopically-verified cases. When age, gender and sub-site were considered, RERs ranged from 1.52 to 2.40 for the European populations (with the USA as a reference). After inclusion of morphology codes, the range of RERs fell to between 1.28 and 1.86, mainly because of the high frequency of adenocarcinoma in polyps in the USA. This analysis suggests that the large survival advantage for colorectal cancer patients in the USA can only marginally be explained by differences in the distribution of sub-site and morphology. The main explanatory difference is the proportion of adenocarcinoma in polyps.

Introduction

Survival for most of the major adult cancers is higher in the United States of America (USA) than in Europe, especially among the oldest patients [1]. In the USA, 5-year relative survival for patients diagnosed with cancers of the colon and rectum during 1985–1989 were 60 and 57%, respectively, while in Europe the figs. were 48% for colon and 44% for rectum. These differences persisted in all 17 European populations studied, even the most affluent such as Sweden, Switzerland and The Netherlands.

In international comparisons of cancer survival, the anatomical site of the malignancy is usually defined by the three-digit code in the International Classification of Diseases 2, 3, and the morphologic type of the tumours is rarely taken into account. However, survival from some solid tumours is known to vary according to the precise anatomical location (sub-site) within the organ of origin, and by the morphological type of the tumour 4, 5. The distribution of cancers by sub-site and morphology also varies between countries [6].

The aim of this paper was to examine the extent to which anatomical location and morphological type influence the differences in colorectal cancer survival between the USA and Europe.

Section snippets

Patients and methods

The European data were contributed by 40 population-based cancer registries in 17 countries: four from Northern Europe (Iceland, Finland, Sweden and Denmark), four from Eastern Europe (Slovenia, Slovakia, Poland and Estonia), and nine from Western Europe (Scotland, England, The Netherlands, Germany, Austria, Switzerland, France, Italy and Spain) as part of the EUROCARE project 7, 8. The American data were taken from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, which is

Results

The available data included 160 381 cases of colorectal cancer for Europe and 54 471 cases for the USA. Autopsy-detected cases (0.4% in USA, 0.9% in Europe) were excluded, as were DCO registrations (0.7% in USA, 4.8% in Europe). Total exclusions from the analysis were 9137 cases (5.7%) in Europe and 587 (1.1%) in USA. In all, 205 128 patients were included in the analyses, 151 244 from Europe and 53 884 from the USA (Table 1).

Less than 1% of cases were lost to follow-up the USA (0.9%) or Europe

Discussion

This study has analysed survival for colorectal cancer in Europe and the USA taking into account age, sub-site and morphology code. Stage was unavailable for the majority of European registries so comparisons taking stage into consideration was only performed between the US and those European registries for which stage information was available.

Nevertheless, a major staging indicator is incorporated into the morphology code adenocarcinoma in polyps. Therefore, adjusting for morphology also

The EUROCARE Working Group for this study

Austria: W. Oberaigner (Cancer Registry of Tyrol); Denmark: H.H. Storm (Danish Cancer Society); Estonia: T. Aareleid (Estonian Cancer Registry); Finland: T. Hakulinen (Finnish Cancer Registry); France: H. Lefevre (Calvados Digestive Cancer Registry), J. MaceLesec'h (Calvados General Cancer Registry), P. Arveux (Doubs Cancer Registry), H. Mathieu-Daude' (Herault Cancer Registry) N. Raverdy (Somme Cancer Registry); Germany: H. Ziegler (Saarland Cancer Registry); Iceland: L. Tryggvadottir

Acknowledgments

This work would not have been possible without the sustained effort over many years of cancer registries across Europe, and we are extremely grateful for their co-operation. The EUROCARE study was financed through the BIOMED Programme of the European Community. This study was also financed by the ‘Europe against Cancer' programme (project number S 12.117414 ‘Differences in the survival of colorectal cancer patients between Europe and USA'). The authors are grateful to Emily Taussig for

References (23)

  • US Department of Health and Human Services. National Cancer Institute, Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results...
  • Cited by (107)

    • Colorectal Cancer

      2016, International Encyclopedia of Public Health
    • Colorectal cancer survival by stage of cases diagnosed in Mallorca, Spain, between 2006 and 2011 and factors associated with survival

      2016, Cancer Epidemiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      For all these reasons, replication of this study in other Spanish cancer registries seems desirable. Our study also adds new evidence concerning the deleterious effect on survival of colorectal cancer of mucinous adenocarcinoma histology [19], whereas no differences were found between adenocarcinoma NOS or adenocarcinoma on polyp—supposedly an early stage of adenocarcinoma, and thus with better survival [20]. MI of unknown stage has been recommended [21], and used increasingly by some authors [22,23], but not by others [24], who keep the unknown category while trying to reduce it by making some assumptions, such as assigning Dukes A stage to patients who have undergone endoscopic polypectomy, or Dukes D to cases that have undergone palliative surgery.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Preliminary findings were presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Groupe pour 1 ‘Enregistrement du cancer dans les pays de Lan gue Latine (GRELL) in Neuchâtel, Switzerland, 24–25 May 2001.

    View full text