Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing standard care with a physician and pharmacist team approach for uncontrolled hypertension

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of a physician and pharmacist teamwork approach to uncontrolled hypertension in a medical resident teaching clinic, for patients who failed to meet the recommended goals of the fifth Joint National Commission on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.

HYPOTHESIS: Physician and pharmacist teamwork can improve the rate of meeting national blood pressure goals in patients with previously uncontrolled hypertension.

DESIGN: A single-blinded randomized controlled trial lasting 6 months.

SETTING: A primary care outpatient teaching clinic.

PATIENTS: A sample of 95 adult hypertensive patients who failed to meet national blood pressure goals based on three consecutive visits over a 6-month period.

INTERVENTION: Patients were randomly assigned to a control arm of standard medical care or to an intervention arm in which a physician and pharmacist worked together as a team.

MAIN RESULTS: At study completion, the percentage of patients achieving national goals due to intervention was more than double the percentage in the control arm (55% vs 20%, p < .001). Systolic blood pressure declined 23 mm Hg in the intervention arm versus 11 mm Hg in the control arm (p < .01). Diastolic blood pressure declined 14 and 3 mm Hg in the intervention and control arms, respectively (p < .001). The intervention worked equally as well in men and women and demonstrated noticeable promise in a minority of mixed-ancestry Hawaiians in whom hypertension is of special concern.

CONCLUSIONS: Patients who fail to achieve national blood pressure goals under standard outpatient medical care may benefit from a program that includes a physician and pharmacist teamwork approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. The Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. The fifth report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure (JNC V). Arch Intern Med. 1993;153:154–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Trends in the prevalence, awareness, treatment and control of hypertension in the adult US population. Data from the health examination surveys, 1960 to 1991. Hypertension. 1995;26:60–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kosecoff J, Kanouse DE, Rogers WH, et al. Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice. JAMA. 1987;258:2708–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lomas J, Anderson GM, Domnick-Pierre K, et al. Do practice guidelines guide practice? N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1306–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Avorn J, Soumerai SB. Improving drug therapy decisions through educational outreach: a randomized controlled trial of academically based “detailing.” N Engl J Med. 1983;308:1457–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bogden P, Koontz L, Williamson P, Abbott R. The physician and pharmacist team: an effective approach to cholesterol reduction. J Gen Intern Med. 1997;12:158–64.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Netter J, Wasserman W. Applied Linear Statistical Models. Homewood, Ill: Richard D. Irwin; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. Boston, Mass: PWS Kent Publishing Co; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Morse GD, Douglas JB, Upton JH, et al. Effect of pharmacist intervention on control of resistant hypertension. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1986;43:905–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Monteagudo FSE, Robins AH, Barnett L. Questioning the proof for effectiveness of pharmacist intervention in blood pressure control. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1987;44:69–70.

    Google Scholar 

  11. McKenney JM, Slining JM, Henderson HR, et al. Effect of clinical pharmacy services on patients with essential hypertension. Circulation. 1973;48:1104–11.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Curb JD, Aluli NE, Kautz JA, et al. Cardiovascular risk factor levels in ethnic Hawaiians. Am J Public Health. 1991;81:164–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Braun KL, Look MA, Tsark JA. High mortality rates in Native Hawaiians. Hawaii Med J. 1995;54:723–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not reflect the official policy or position of the Queen’s Medical Center.

This work was supported by a grant from the Queen’s Medical Center, Honolulu, Hawaii and by a Research Centers in Minorities Institutions Award (P20 RR 11091) from the National Institutes of Health.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bogden, P.E., Abbott, R.D., Williamson, P. et al. Comparing standard care with a physician and pharmacist team approach for uncontrolled hypertension. J GEN INTERN MED 13, 740–745 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00225.x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1497.1998.00225.x

Key words

Navigation