Skip to main content
Log in

The impact of a primary care physician cooperative on the caseload of an emergency department: The maastricht integrated out-of-hours service

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of General Internal Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of an out-of-hours primary care physician (PCP) cooperative on the caseload at the emergency department (ED) and to study characteristics of patients utilizing out-of-hours care.

DESIGN: A pre-post intervention design was used. During a 3-week period before and a 3-week period after establishing the PCP cooperative, all patient records with out-of-hours primary and emergency care were analyzed.

SETTING: Primary care in Maastricht (the Netherlands) is delivered by 59 PCPs. Primary care physicians formerly organized out-of-hours care in small locum groups. In January 2000, out-of-hours primary care was reorganized, and a PCP cooperative was established. This cooperative is located at the ED of the University Hospital Maastricht, the city’s only hospital, which has no emergency medicine specialists.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of patients utilizing out-of-hours care, their age and sex, diagnoses, post-ED care, and serious adverse events.

RESULTS. After establishing the PCP cooperative, the proportion of patients utilizing emergency care decreased by 53%, and the proportion of patients utilizing primary care increased by 25%. The shift was the largest for patients with musculoskeletal disorders or skin problems. There were fewer hospital admissions, and fewer subsequent referrals to the patient’s own PCP and medical specialists. No substantial change in new outpatient visits at the hospital or in mortality occurred.

CONCLUSIONS: In the city of Maastricht, the Netherlands, the PCP cooperative reduced the use of hospital emergency care during out-of-hours care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bindman AB, Majeed A. Primary care in the United States: organisation of primary care in the United States. BMJ. 2003;326:631–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. St. Peter RF. Gatekeeping arrangements are in widespread use. Data Bull (Cent Stud Health Syst Change). 1997;7:1–2.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kulu-Glasgow I, Delnoij D, de Bakker D. Self-referral in a gatekeeping system: patients’ reasons for skipping the general-practitioner. Health Policy. 1998;45:221–38.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schneider SM, Gallery ME, Schafermeyer R, Zwemer FL. Emergency department crowding: a point in time. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;42:167–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Derlet R, Richards J, Kravitz R. Frequent overcrowding in U.S. emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med. 2001;8:151–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shah NM, Shah MA, Behbehani J. Predictors of non-urgent utilization of hospital emergency services in Kuwait. Soc Sci Med. 1996;42:1313–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee A, Lau FL, Hazlett CB, et al. Factors associated with non-urgent utilization of accident and emergency services: a case-control study in Hong Kong. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1075–85.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Fatovich DM. Emergency medicine. BMJ. 2002;324:958–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dale J, Green J, Reid F, Glucksman E. Primary care in the accident and emergency department. I: Prospective identification of patients. BMJ. 1995;311:423–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cooke MW, Wilson S, Pearson S. The effect of a separate stream for minor injuries on accident and emergency department waiting times. Emerg Med J. 2002;19:28–30.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Freeman GK, Meakin RP, Lawrenson RA, Leydon GM, Craig G. Primary care units in A&E departments in North Thames in the 1990s: initial experience and future implications. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49:107–10.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ward P, Huddy J, Hargreaves S, Touquet R, Hurley J, Fothergill J. Primary care in London: an evaluation of general practitioners working in an inner city accident and emergency department. J Accid Emerg Med. 1996;13:11–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Dale J, Green J, Reid F, Glucksman E, Higgs R. Primary care in the accident and emergency department. II: Comparison of general practitioners and hospital doctors. BMJ. 1995;311:427–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Murphy AW, Bury G, Plunkett PK, et al. Randomised controlled trial of general practitioner versus usual medical care in an urban accident and emergency department: process, outcome, and comparative cost. BMJ. 1996;312:1135–42.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Washington DL, Stevens CD, Shekelle PG, Baker DW, Fink A, Brook RH. Safely directing patients to appropriate levels of care: guideline-driven triage in the emergency service. Ann Emerg Med. 2000;36:15–22.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Washington DL, Stevens CD, Shekelle PG, Henneman PL, Brook RH. Next-day care for emergency department users with nonacute conditions. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 2002;137:707–14.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hallam L. Primary medical care outside normal working hours: review of published work. BMJ. 1994;308:249–53.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Olesen F, Jolleys JV. Out of hours service: the Danish solution examined. BMJ. 1994;309:1624–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Lamberts H, Wood M, eds. International Classification of Primary Care. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Britt H, Angelis M, Harris E. The reliability and validity of doctor-recorded morbidity data in active data collection systems. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1998;16:50–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Starfield B. Is primary care essential? Lancet. 1994;344:1129–33.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Dale J, Lang H, Roberts JA, Green J, Glucksman E. Cost effectiveness of treating primary care patients in accident and emergency: a comparison between general practitioners, senior house officers, and registrars. BMJ. 1996;312:1340–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Coleman P, Irons R, Nicholl J. Will alternative immediate care services reduce demands for non-urgent treatment at accident and emergency? Emerg Med J. 2001;18:482–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferris TG, Chang Y, Blumenthal D, Pearson SD. Leaving gatekeeping behind—effects of opening access to specialists for adults in a health maintenance organization. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:1312–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Schillinger D, Bibbins-Domingo K, Vranizan K, Bacchetti P, Luce JM, Bindman AB. Effects of primary care coordination on public hospital patients. J Gen Intern Med. 2000;15:329–36.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Rask KJ, Deaton C, Culler SD, et al. The effect of primary care gatekeepers on the management of patients with chest pain. Am J Manag Care. 1999;5:1274–82.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Grumbach K, Selby JV, Damberg C, et al. Resolving the gatekeeper conundrum: what patients value in primary care and referrals to specialists. JAMA. 1999;282:261–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Halm EA, Causino N, Blumenthal D. Is gatekeeping better than traditional care? A survey of physicians’ attitudes. JAMA. 1997;278:1677–81.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Boerma WG, van der Zee J, Fleming DM. Service profiles of general practitioners in Europe. European GP Task Profile Study. Br J Gen Pract. 1997;47:481–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Anderson GF, Hurst J, Hussey PS, Jee-Hughes M. Health spending and outcomes: trends in OECD countries, 1960–1998. Health Aff (Millwood). 2000;19:150–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Forrest CB. Primary care in the United States: primary care gatekeeping and referrals: effective filter or failed experiment? BMJ. 2003;326:692–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caro J. T. van Uden MSc.

Additional information

None of the authors has any conflict of interest relevant to this manuscript or the data.

This study was financially supported by a grant from the Dutch Health Insurance Board (registered as VAZ/CVZ project no. 00103) and by AstraZeneca.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Uden, C.J.T., Winkens, R.A.G., Wesseling, G. et al. The impact of a primary care physician cooperative on the caseload of an emergency department: The maastricht integrated out-of-hours service. J GEN INTERN MED 20, 612–617 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0091.x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0091.x

Key words

Navigation