Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Advertisement
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research Article

Patients with suspected myocardial infarction: effect of mode of referral on admission time to a coronary care unit.

R A Ahmad, S Bond, J Burke, S P Singh and R D Watson
British Journal of General Practice 1992; 42 (357): 145-147.
R A Ahmad
Department of Cardiology, Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S Bond
Department of Cardiology, Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J Burke
Department of Cardiology, Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S P Singh
Department of Cardiology, Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R D Watson
Department of Cardiology, Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

The aim of this prospective study was to determine the delay between the onset of symptoms and arrival in the coronary care unit of patients with suspected acute myocardial infarction, and the relative contribution to the total delay of patient delay, method of referral (self referral or general practitioner referral) and delay in the hospital before reaching the coronary care unit. All patients admitted with chest pain to the coronary care unit at Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham, over the six month period April-September 1989 were included in the study. Ninety five patients were referred by their general practitioner and 107 patients attended the accident and emergency department directly or arrived by ambulance without contacting their general practitioner. The proportion of self referred and general practitioner referred patients with acute myocardial infarction, angina and non-cardiac chest pain were not significantly different. The total delay was significantly longer for patients who had been referred by their general practitioner (median 5.3 hours) than for self referrals (3.2 hours, P less than 0.001), with a significantly higher proportion of self referrals arriving at the coronary care unit within six hours of the onset of symptoms (77% versus 54%, P less than 0.01). Among general practitioner referrals, initial patient delay accounted for a median of 2.5 hours and the general practitioner's response time for a median of 1.1 hours. The delay in hospital was similar for both groups of patients. In inner city areas, self referral may result in considerably less delay than general practitioner referral allowing a greater proportion of patients to receive effective thrombolytic therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 42 (357)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 42, Issue 357
April 1992
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Patients with suspected myocardial infarction: effect of mode of referral on admission time to a coronary care unit.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Patients with suspected myocardial infarction: effect of mode of referral on admission time to a coronary care unit.
R A Ahmad, S Bond, J Burke, S P Singh, R D Watson
British Journal of General Practice 1992; 42 (357): 145-147.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Patients with suspected myocardial infarction: effect of mode of referral on admission time to a coronary care unit.
R A Ahmad, S Bond, J Burke, S P Singh, R D Watson
British Journal of General Practice 1992; 42 (357): 145-147.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • New concepts in screening.
  • Screening for colorectal cancer: decisions in general practice.
  • Factors influencing help seeking in mentally distressed young adults: a cross-sectional survey.
Show more Research Article

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242