Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Blog
    • eLetters
    • Feedback
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Blog
    • eLetters
    • Feedback
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
Research Article

Elderly people's views of an annual screening assessment.

I B McIntosh and K G Power
British Journal of General Practice 1993; 43 (370): 189-192.
I B McIntosh
Murray Royal Hospital, Stirling.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K G Power
Murray Royal Hospital, Stirling.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

A survey was carried out in order to identify elderly patients' perceptions of their health status, their health worries and their opinions regarding health screening before and after the introduction of an annual screening programme. Pre- and post-assessment self report, structured questionnaires and standardized, objectively scored, functional and medical assessments were used. The cohort was an age and sex stratified, 20% sample of those aged 75 years and over (133 patients). Results showed that 96% of patients before the assessment and 98% of patients afterwards, considered the annual assessment useful. The domiciliary visit by the health visitors resulted in one third of those patients who perceived themselves to be in good health and three quarters of those who perceived themselves to be in poor health becoming less worried about their health. Only two patients became more worried. Half of those objectively assessed as being in the medium health risk group and 68% of those in the high health risk group became less worried about their health after screening. Despite the majority of patients having welcomed the assessment their visit resulted in false, and potentially harmful, reassurance for a considerable number of individuals objectively assessed as being at medium and high health risk. An adverse consequence of health screening in elderly people may be inappropriate reassurance for those objectively assessed to be at risk. However, screening procedures are a means to an end, not an end in themselves. The identification of those at high risk should see subsequent implementation of services, investigations and increased support to relieve suffering, so it may have been that patients felt less anxious because they were anticipating relief of their problems.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 43 (370)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 43, Issue 370
May 1993
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Elderly people's views of an annual screening assessment.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
Citation Tools
Elderly people's views of an annual screening assessment.
I B McIntosh, K G Power
British Journal of General Practice 1993; 43 (370): 189-192.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Elderly people's views of an annual screening assessment.
I B McIntosh, K G Power
British Journal of General Practice 1993; 43 (370): 189-192.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Screening for colorectal cancer: decisions in general practice.
  • Factors influencing help seeking in mentally distressed young adults: a cross-sectional survey.
  • Interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional education.
Show more Research Article

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

 

Register by 10 December and save 15% at the BJGP Research Conference, 12 March 2020

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Blog
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2019 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242