Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research Article

Detecting patients with Alzheimer's disease suitable for drug treatment: comparison of three methods of assessment.

G K Wilcock, D L Ashworth, J A Langfield and P M Smith
British Journal of General Practice 1994; 44 (378): 30-33.
G K Wilcock
Department of Care of the Elderly, University of Bristol.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D L Ashworth
Department of Care of the Elderly, University of Bristol.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J A Langfield
Department of Care of the Elderly, University of Bristol.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P M Smith
Department of Care of the Elderly, University of Bristol.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND. Therapy to enhance cholinergic function in the brain is under evaluation for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease. Tetrahydroaminoacridine (tacrine) has recently received a product licence in the United States of America for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease, and the licence application in the United Kingdom will shortly be reviewed. It is therefore possible that this drug will become available for use in the UK in due course. There will then be a need for screening procedures for a large number of elderly patients to decide whether or not they have dementia and, if so, whether it is the result of Alzheimer's disease and is suitable for treatment with the new drug. METHOD. A total of 246 patients aged 75 years or over in two general practices in Bristol were assessed to investigate the potential workload such screening would engender. Three different assessment schedules for the diagnosis of dementia were compared--the mini-mental state examination, the Kew test, and the abbreviated mental test score. RESULTS. None of the assessment schedules was found to be particularly onerous, with median times for administration of five, three and two minutes, respectively. A score of 23 or less on the mini-mental state examination was taken as the main cut-off point for further evaluation. Sixty six patients obtained this score--in 25 the low score reflected factors other than dementia, and 11 others declined further assessment. Of the remaining 30 patients only four had probable Alzheimer's disease at an appropriate level of severity for treatment, and lived with a carer who could ensure compliance and monitor side effects. Two of these patients were receiving conflicting medical treatment and a third declined therapy, leaving only one person for whom treatment could be prescribed. CONCLUSION. It seems likely that of those medically suitable for treatment, it may not be possible to prescribe tacrine for an appreciable proportion. Nevertheless, all potential patients should be screened as the procedures involved are not onerous and at least some of those found suitable for treatment are likely to benefit from this new approach.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 44 (378)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 44, Issue 378
January 1994
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Detecting patients with Alzheimer's disease suitable for drug treatment: comparison of three methods of assessment.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Detecting patients with Alzheimer's disease suitable for drug treatment: comparison of three methods of assessment.
G K Wilcock, D L Ashworth, J A Langfield, P M Smith
British Journal of General Practice 1994; 44 (378): 30-33.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Detecting patients with Alzheimer's disease suitable for drug treatment: comparison of three methods of assessment.
G K Wilcock, D L Ashworth, J A Langfield, P M Smith
British Journal of General Practice 1994; 44 (378): 30-33.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • A primary care intervention programme for obesity and coronary heart disease risk factor reduction.
  • Access to health care prior to suicide: findings from a psychological autopsy study.
  • Suicide and attempted suicide in France: results of a general practice sentinel network, 1999-2001.
Show more Research Article

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242