Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research Article

To what extent do clinical notes by general practitioners reflect actual medical performance? A study using simulated patients.

J J Rethans, E Martin and J Metsemakers
British Journal of General Practice 1994; 44 (381): 153-156.
J J Rethans
Centre for Quality Assurance in Research in General Practice, University of Limburg, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E Martin
Centre for Quality Assurance in Research in General Practice, University of Limburg, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J Metsemakers
Centre for Quality Assurance in Research in General Practice, University of Limburg, Maastricht, Netherlands.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Information

vol. 44 no. 381 153-156
PubMed 
8185988

Published By 
Royal College of General Practitioners
Print ISSN 
0960-1643
Online ISSN 
1478-5242
History 
  • Published online April 1, 1994.


Author Information

  1. J J Rethans,
  2. E Martin and
  3. J Metsemakers
  1. Centre for Quality Assurance in Research in General Practice, University of Limburg, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Article usage

Article usage: December 2013 to April 2022

AbstractFullPdf
Dec 2013100
Jan 2014100
Mar 2014500
Apr 2014500
May 2014402
Jun 20141202
Jul 2014506
Aug 2014503
Sep 20141009
Oct 201419013
Nov 20148016
Dec 201412114
Jan 2015501
Feb 2015204
Mar 20150010
Apr 2015107
May 2015002
Jun 2015405
Jul 2015804
Aug 2015908
Sep 2015606
Oct 20151002
Nov 2015803
Dec 201513010
Jan 20169010
Feb 20161305
Mar 20162306
Apr 20161103
May 20161207
Jun 2016800
Jul 20161902
Aug 2016306
Sep 20161509
Oct 20161306
Nov 20161207
Dec 20161303
Jan 2017803
Feb 2017802
Mar 2017400
Apr 2017501
May 2017504
Jun 201713026
Jul 20171003
Aug 2017408
Sep 2017808
Oct 2017606
Nov 20171908
Dec 201724024
Jan 20182303
Feb 2018705
Mar 20189013
Apr 2018208
May 2018602
Jun 20181203
Jul 2018203
Aug 20181105
Sep 2018600
Oct 20181405
Nov 2018805
Dec 2018401
Jan 2019903
Feb 20191205
Mar 2019604
Apr 20198013
May 2019806
Jun 2019307
Jul 2019603
Aug 2019503
Sep 2019405
Oct 20191005
Nov 2019904
Dec 2019604
Jan 20201608
Feb 2020603
Mar 2020602
Apr 2020801
May 20201001
Jun 2020301
Jul 2020400
Aug 2020803
Sep 20201305
Oct 2020405
Nov 2020500
Dec 2020900
Jan 2021603
Feb 2021803
Mar 2021302
Apr 2021408
May 20211607
Jun 2021602
Jul 20211109
Aug 2021400
Sep 20211004
Oct 2021701
Nov 2021308
Dec 2021309
Jan 2022907
Feb 2022301
Mar 2022602
Apr 2022806

Statistics from Altmetric.com

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 44 (381)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 44, Issue 381
April 1994
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
To what extent do clinical notes by general practitioners reflect actual medical performance? A study using simulated patients.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
To what extent do clinical notes by general practitioners reflect actual medical performance? A study using simulated patients.
J J Rethans, E Martin, J Metsemakers
British Journal of General Practice 1994; 44 (381): 153-156.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
To what extent do clinical notes by general practitioners reflect actual medical performance? A study using simulated patients.
J J Rethans, E Martin, J Metsemakers
British Journal of General Practice 1994; 44 (381): 153-156.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Improving the ascertainment of families at high risk of colorectal cancer: a prospective GP register study.
  • Exploratory cluster randomised controlled trial of shared care development for long-term mental illness.
  • Integrated primary mental health care: threat or opportunity in the new NHS?
Show more Research Article

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242