Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research Article

The management of hypertension in the elderly by general practitioners in Merseyside: the rule of halves revisited.

M Cranney, S Barton and T Walley
British Journal of General Practice 1998; 48 (429): 1146-1150.
M Cranney
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S Barton
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T Walley
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, University of Liverpool.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Treatment of hypertension in the elderly significantly reduces cardiovascular events and confers greater absolute benefit compared with treating younger adults. However, this group has been undertreated in the past. AIM: To perform a reliable and valid multipractice audit of the current management of elderly hypertensive patients. METHOD: An observational study conducted as multiple standardized audits in general practices. The notes of 6139 patients aged 65 years or over from 76 general practices in Merseyside were examined to determine the percentage of elderly patients who had their blood pressure recorded. The percentages of hypertensive patients who were diagnosed, treated, and controlled was also recorded. RESULTS: Eighty-one per cent of the sample had their blood pressure recorded. Fifty-three per cent of patients over the age of 65 were identified as hypertensive; 64% of hypertensive patients are receiving antihypertensive medication and 54% of treated hypertensive patients can be considered controlled. However, very small changes in the criteria used to define blood pressure control have dramatic effects on the results. Digit preference and the number of available blood pressure recordings also significantly affect the results. CONCLUSION: The management of hypertension in the elderly by Merseyside general practitioners (GPs) gives better results than predicted by the 'rule of halves'. Elderly hypertensive patients are more likely to be detected and treated, but only half achieve control to 160/90. The results are particularly sensitive to the degree of digit preference, the number of available recordings, and to the precise definition used for control.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 48 (429)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 48, Issue 429
April 1998
  • Table of Contents
  • Cover (PDF)
  • Index by author
  • Advertising (PDF)
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The management of hypertension in the elderly by general practitioners in Merseyside: the rule of halves revisited.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The management of hypertension in the elderly by general practitioners in Merseyside: the rule of halves revisited.
M Cranney, S Barton, T Walley
British Journal of General Practice 1998; 48 (429): 1146-1150.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The management of hypertension in the elderly by general practitioners in Merseyside: the rule of halves revisited.
M Cranney, S Barton, T Walley
British Journal of General Practice 1998; 48 (429): 1146-1150.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • How much of general practice is based on evidence?
  • Improving the ascertainment of families at high risk of colorectal cancer: a prospective GP register study.
  • Exploratory cluster randomised controlled trial of shared care development for long-term mental illness.
Show more Research Article

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242