Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research Article

The prognosis of non-critical limb ischaemia: a systematic review of population-based evidence.

J D Hooi, H E Stoffers, J A Knottnerus and J W van Ree
British Journal of General Practice 1999; 49 (438): 49-55.
J D Hooi
Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, The Netherlands. Jurenne.Hooi@HAG.UniMass.NL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H E Stoffers
Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, The Netherlands. Jurenne.Hooi@HAG.UniMass.NL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J A Knottnerus
Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, The Netherlands. Jurenne.Hooi@HAG.UniMass.NL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J W van Ree
Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, The Netherlands. Jurenne.Hooi@HAG.UniMass.NL
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) is the most common peripheral vascular disorder in the elderly. A clear picture of the disease's course, especially in patients with non-critical limb ischaemia (Fontaine stages I and II), is essential for the general practitioner, who plays a key role in the diagnosis and management of PAOD. AIM: To evaluate the population-based evidence on the course and prognosis of PAOD. METHODS: An exhaustive literature search yielded 16 population-based studies on the prognosis of PAOD. The methodological qualities of the studies were assessed according to eight criteria. RESULTS: Thirteen studies of high methodological quality show that data on the course, cardiovascular morbidity, and mortality of asymptomatic PAOD are scarce. Only a small group of asymptomatic patients seem to develop intermittent claudication symptoms. However, asymptomatic patients appear to have the same increased risk for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality when compared with claudicants. No data were available on prognostic factors for intermittent claudication and cardiovascular morbidity in asymptomatic patients. The course, cardiovascular morbidity, and mortality of symptomatic PAOD are better documented. A small group of claudicants experience symptom progression. Smoking, hypertension, increasing age, and diabetes are the most relevant risk factors for intermittent claudication. Claudicants are at a higher risk for developing other cardiovascular diseases, resulting in a significantly increased mortality mainly owing to coronary heart disease. Intermittent claudication and a low ankle-brachial pressure index are significant predictors of mortality. Men had intermittent claudication and symptom progression more often than women. Cardiovascular (co-)morbidity was common in both male and female PAOD patients, but male PAOD patients had a higher mortality compared with female PAOD patients. CONCLUSION: Given the current knowledge on the prognosis of PAOD in the general population, an important task for (secondary) prevention is reserved for the general practitioner. Further research is required to document the course and prognosis of asymptomatic PAOD patients.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 49 (438)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 49, Issue 438
January 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The prognosis of non-critical limb ischaemia: a systematic review of population-based evidence.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The prognosis of non-critical limb ischaemia: a systematic review of population-based evidence.
J D Hooi, H E Stoffers, J A Knottnerus, J W van Ree
British Journal of General Practice 1999; 49 (438): 49-55.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The prognosis of non-critical limb ischaemia: a systematic review of population-based evidence.
J D Hooi, H E Stoffers, J A Knottnerus, J W van Ree
British Journal of General Practice 1999; 49 (438): 49-55.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • New concepts in screening.
  • Screening for colorectal cancer: decisions in general practice.
  • Factors influencing help seeking in mentally distressed young adults: a cross-sectional survey.
Show more Research Article

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242