Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions

Table of Contents

February 2000; Volume 50,Issue 451

Article

  • You have access
    Research papers this month
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 89-90.
  • You have access
    The Back Pages
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 161-176.

Research Article

  • You have access
    Primary care groups and research networks: opportunities for R&D in context.
    P Thomas, J Kai, A O'Dwyer and F Griffiths
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 91-92.
  • You have access
    A cautious welcome for the new guidelines on management of drug dependence.
    M B Gabbay and T Carnwath
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 92-93.
  • You have access
    A pharmaceutical needs assessment in a primary care setting.
    S E Williams, C M Bond and C Menzies
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 95-99.
  • You have access
    Do GPs working in practice with high or low prescribing costs have different views on prescribing cost issues?
    A J Avery, R V Wetzels, S Rodgers and C O'Neill
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 100-104.
  • You have access
    Patients with cancer holding their own records: a randomised controlled trial.
    M Drury, P Yudkin, J Harcourt, R Fitzpatrick, L Jones, C Alcock and M Minton
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 105-110.
  • You have access
    Changes in receptionists' attitudes towards involvement in a general practice-based trial of screening and brief alcohol intervention.
    C A Lock, E F Kaner, N Heather, E Gilvarry and B R McAvoy
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 111-115.
  • You have access
    The process of outpatient referral and care: the experiences and views of patients, their general practitioners, and specialists.
    A Bowling and J Redfern
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 116-120.
  • You have access
    Are specialist mental health services being targeted on the most needy patients? The effects of setting up special services in general practice.
    T Kendrick, T Burns, C Garland, N Greenwood and P Smith
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 121-126.
  • You have access
    Estimation of cardiovascular risk in hypertensive patients in primary care.
    A A Montgomery, T Fahey, C MacKintosh, D J Sharp and T J Peters
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 127-128.
  • You have access
    Survey of the use of selective culture for Neisseria gonorrhoeae in specimens from the female genital tract sent by general practitioners to a microbiology laboratory.
    T Gillespie and I McKay
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 129-130.
  • You have access
    Factors influencing general practitioner referrals to a tertiary paediatric neurodisability service.
    N Dale and J Godsman
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 131-132.
  • You have access
    Antimicrobial agents in lower respiratory tract infections in Dutch general practice.
    M M Kuyvenhoven, T J Verheij, R A de Melker and J van der Velden
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 133-134.
  • You have access
    Nebulised steroid in the treatment of croup: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.
    S Griffin, S Ellis, A Fitzgerald-Barron, J Rose and M Egger
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 135-141.
  • You have access
    Not so simple cystitis: how should prescribers be supported to make informed decisions about the increasing prevalence of infections caused by drug-resistant bacteria?
    P Davey, D Steinke, T MacDonald, G Phillips and F Sullivan
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 143-146.

Letter

  • You have access
    QT lengthening and life-threatening arrhythmias associated with fexofenadine.
    P M Craig-McFeely, S L Freemantle, G L Pearce and S A Shakir
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 148.
  • You have access
    Sex differences in incidence rates and referral ratios for first attack angina pectoris.
    W C Leung
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 148-149.
  • You have access
    Patient-centredness and outcomes in primary care.
    C P Bradley, M Crowley, C Barry, F A Stevenson, N Britten and N Barber
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 149.
  • You have access
    Randomised controlled trials in general practice.
    S Paterson
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 150.
  • You have access
    Colorectal cancer.
    B Woodhouse
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 150.
  • You have access
    Prescribing and French trainees.
    P Cawston
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 151.
  • You have access
    Non-attendance at psychiatric outpatient clinics.
    W Hamilton, A Round and D Sharp
    British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (451): 151.
Back to top
PreviousNext

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 50 (451)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 50, Issue 451
February 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Alert me to new issues
  • eLetters
  • Most Cited
  • Most Read
Loading
Reducing medicolegal vulnerability: let’s evaluate decision processes, not clinical outcomes
Clinical prediction tools to identify patients at highest risk of myeloma in primary care
Explaining why further antibiotics are usually not recommended for post treatment Lyme disease syndrome
Primary care contacts. Training of future GP's
A step towards improving cervical screening uptake
View all eLetters

Jump to

  • Article
  • Research Article
  • Letter
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242