Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research Article

The impact of nursing home patients on general practitioners' workload.

L Groom, A J Avery, D Boot, C O'Neill, K Thornhill, K Brown and R Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (455): 473-476.
L Groom
Division of General Practice, University of Nottingham Medical School.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A J Avery
Division of General Practice, University of Nottingham Medical School.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D Boot
Division of General Practice, University of Nottingham Medical School.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C O'Neill
Division of General Practice, University of Nottingham Medical School.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K Thornhill
Division of General Practice, University of Nottingham Medical School.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K Brown
Division of General Practice, University of Nottingham Medical School.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R Jones
Division of General Practice, University of Nottingham Medical School.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although the number of people in nursing homes has risen substantially in recent years, the shift of responsibility into general practice has rarely been accompanied by extra resources. These patients may be associated with a higher general practitioner (GP) workload than others of similar age and sex. AIM: To assess the GP workload associated with nursing home residents and its associated costs. METHOD: All nursing home residents aged over 65 years and registered with nine Nottinghamshire practices during one year were matched with patients living in the community for general practice, age, and sex. Data were collected retrospectively for both groups on key workload measures. Costs for the workload measures were calculated using published estimates. RESULTS: Data were collected for 270 pairs of patients. Nursing home patients had more face-to-face contacts in normal surgery hours, telephone calls, and out-of-hours visits. The mean workload cost per month of a nursing home patient (assuming that one patient was seen per visit) was estimated to be 18.21 Pounds (10.49 Pounds higher than the cost of controls). A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that potential savings in visiting costs associated with increasing the numbers of patients seen per visit were 27% for one extra patient seen per visit and 44% for four extra patients. CONCLUSION: Nursing home residents were associated with higher workload for GPs than other patients of the same age and sex living in the community. Our costings provide a basis for negotiating suitable reimbursement of GPs for their additional work.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 50 (455)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 50, Issue 455
June 2000
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The impact of nursing home patients on general practitioners' workload.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The impact of nursing home patients on general practitioners' workload.
L Groom, A J Avery, D Boot, C O'Neill, K Thornhill, K Brown, R Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (455): 473-476.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The impact of nursing home patients on general practitioners' workload.
L Groom, A J Avery, D Boot, C O'Neill, K Thornhill, K Brown, R Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2000; 50 (455): 473-476.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • "The cawing of the crow...Cassandra-like, prognosticating woe".
  • New concepts in screening.
  • Screening for colorectal cancer: decisions in general practice.
Show more Research Article

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242