Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research Article

Needs assessment of women with urinary incontinence in a district health authority.

K MacKay and L Hemmett
British Journal of General Practice 2001; 51 (471): 801-804.
K MacKay
Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Health Authority, Holbrook House, The Hyde, Cockfosters Road, London NW9 6QQ.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L Hemmett
Barnet, Enfield and Haringey Health Authority, Holbrook House, The Hyde, Cockfosters Road, London NW9 6QQ.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women is difficult to estimate because definitions vary between researchers and among women, for whom thresholds of complaint differ. However, studies have also shown that only about a quarter of women affected by urinary incontinence consult a doctor for their symptoms, despite evidence of effective treatments and better management of the condition in primary care. AIM: To assess the perceived needs of women with urinary incontinence living at home. DESIGN: Cross-sectional community survey. SETTING: A 1% stratified random sample of women living at home, registered with a local GP, and aged 45 years and over (n = 720) in a north London district health authority with a total population of 308,000. RESULTS: Out of 720 questionnaires, 489 were returned completed (68%). A total of 227 (46%) women had symptoms of significant urinary incontinence. Seventy-eight (16%) had significant symptoms which they said were not a problem, and 149 (30%) of the total number of responders acknowledged that they had significant symptoms and that these symptoms were a problem for them; of these, 48 (32%) sought help from their GP; 16 out of the 48 consulting their GP were happy with the treatment given, and the remaining 101 women who considered their incontinence to be a problem had not consulted their GP and 76 of those had also not told anyone else that they had a problem. The commonest reasons given by the 101 women who admitted having a problem and who had not consulted their GPs were that they thought that they should cope on their own (43 [42.6%]), that incontinence was inevitable with age (26 [25.7%]) or that it was embarrassing to talk about the problem to their GP (14 [13.8%]). CONCLUSIONS: Despite the existence of effective interventions for urinary incontinence, many women who are incontinent do not seek help even when they perceive their incontinence to be a problem. Half of the women who did consult their GP did not find the treatment offered helpful. Achieving health gain for women with urinary incontinence will require a more active approach than currently exists to inform people that better care is available, to help counteract the stigma attached to the problem, and to ensure that primary care professionals are able to provide effective services.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 51 (471)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 51, Issue 471
October 2001
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Needs assessment of women with urinary incontinence in a district health authority.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Needs assessment of women with urinary incontinence in a district health authority.
K MacKay, L Hemmett
British Journal of General Practice 2001; 51 (471): 801-804.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Needs assessment of women with urinary incontinence in a district health authority.
K MacKay, L Hemmett
British Journal of General Practice 2001; 51 (471): 801-804.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • New concepts in screening.
  • Screening for colorectal cancer: decisions in general practice.
  • Factors influencing help seeking in mentally distressed young adults: a cross-sectional survey.
Show more Research Article

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242