Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research Article

Understanding laboratory testing in diagnostic uncertainty: a qualitative study in general practice.

Trudy van der Weijden, Marloes A van Bokhoven, Geert-Jan Dinant, Cathelijne M van Hasselt and Richard P T M Grol
British Journal of General Practice 2002; 52 (485): 974-980.
Trudy van der Weijden
Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. trudy.vanderweijden@hag.unimaas.nl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Marloes A van Bokhoven
Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. trudy.vanderweijden@hag.unimaas.nl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Geert-Jan Dinant
Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. trudy.vanderweijden@hag.unimaas.nl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Cathelijne M van Hasselt
Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. trudy.vanderweijden@hag.unimaas.nl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard P T M Grol
Department of General Practice, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands. trudy.vanderweijden@hag.unimaas.nl
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Better knowledge of the professional's motives for ordering laboratory tests in the case of diagnostic uncertainty may lead to interventions directed at reducing unnecessary testing. AIM: To gain insight into the general practitioner's (GP's) motives for ordering laboratory tests for patients presenting with unexplained complaints. DESIGN OF STUDY: Semi-structured interviews based on surgery observations. SETTING: Twenty-one general practices in rural and urban areas of The Netherlands. METHOD: Investigation of the GP's perception of determinants of test-ordering behaviour in the situation of diagnostic uncertainty. The interviews were structured by evaluating the consultations and test-ordering performance of that day. RESULTS: Dutch GPs vary considerably in their motives for ordering tests. Numerous motives emerged from the data. Some examples of important themes include: personal routines; tolerance of diagnostic uncertainty; time pressure; and tactical motives for test ordering. Complying with the perceived needs of the patient for reassurance through testing is seen as an easy, cost- and time-effective strategy. A clear hierarchy in the determinants was not found. CONCLUSION: The decision to request laboratory testing is the result of a complex interaction of considerations that are often conflicting. Designers of interventions meant to improve the ordering of tests should be aware of the numerous determinants, and take contextual variables into account.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 52 (485)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 52, Issue 485
December 2002
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Understanding laboratory testing in diagnostic uncertainty: a qualitative study in general practice.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Understanding laboratory testing in diagnostic uncertainty: a qualitative study in general practice.
Trudy van der Weijden, Marloes A van Bokhoven, Geert-Jan Dinant, Cathelijne M van Hasselt, Richard P T M Grol
British Journal of General Practice 2002; 52 (485): 974-980.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Understanding laboratory testing in diagnostic uncertainty: a qualitative study in general practice.
Trudy van der Weijden, Marloes A van Bokhoven, Geert-Jan Dinant, Cathelijne M van Hasselt, Richard P T M Grol
British Journal of General Practice 2002; 52 (485): 974-980.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional education.
  • The role of primary care in the prevention of suicide and accidental deaths among young men: an epidemiological study.
  • A primary care intervention programme for obesity and coronary heart disease risk factor reduction.
Show more Research Article

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242