Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Research Article

Automated quality checks on repeat prescribing.

Jeremy E Rogers, Christopher J Wroe, Angus Roberts, Angela Swallow, David Stables, Judith A Cantrill and Alan L Rector
British Journal of General Practice 2003; 53 (496): 838-844.
Jeremy E Rogers
Medical Informatics Group, Department of Computer Science, Oxford Road, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL. jeremy@cs.man.ac.uk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Christopher J Wroe
Medical Informatics Group, Department of Computer Science, Oxford Road, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL. jeremy@cs.man.ac.uk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angus Roberts
Medical Informatics Group, Department of Computer Science, Oxford Road, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL. jeremy@cs.man.ac.uk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Angela Swallow
Medical Informatics Group, Department of Computer Science, Oxford Road, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL. jeremy@cs.man.ac.uk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
David Stables
Medical Informatics Group, Department of Computer Science, Oxford Road, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL. jeremy@cs.man.ac.uk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judith A Cantrill
Medical Informatics Group, Department of Computer Science, Oxford Road, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL. jeremy@cs.man.ac.uk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Alan L Rector
Medical Informatics Group, Department of Computer Science, Oxford Road, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL. jeremy@cs.man.ac.uk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Good clinical practice in primary care includes periodic review of repeat prescriptions. Markers of prescriptions that may need review have been described, but manually checking all repeat prescriptions against the markers would be impractical. AIM: To investigate the feasibility of computerising the application of repeat prescribing quality checks to electronic patient records in United Kingdom (UK) primary care. DESIGN OF STUDY: Software performance test against benchmark manual analysis of cross-sectional convenience sample of prescribing documentation. SETTING: Three general practices in Greater Manchester, in the north west of England, during a 4-month period in 2001. METHOD: A machine-readable drug information resource, based on the British National Formulary (BNF) as the 'gold standard' for valid drug indications, was installed in three practices. Software raised alerts for each repeat prescribed item where the electronic patient record contained no valid indication for the medication. Alerts raised by the software in two practices were analysed manually. Clinical reaction to the software was assessed by semi-structured interviews in three practices. RESULTS: There was no valid indication in the electronic medical records for 14.8% of repeat prescribed items. Sixty-two per cent of all alerts generated were incorrect. Forty-three per cent of all incorrect alerts were as a result of errors in the drug information resource, 44% to locally idiosyncratic clinical coding, 8% to the use of the BNF without adaptation as a gold standard, and 5% to the inability of the system to infer diagnoses that, although unrecorded, would be 'obvious' to a clinical reading the record. The interviewed clinicians supported the goals of the software. CONCLUSION: Using electronic records for secondary decision support purposes will benefit from (and may require) both more consistent electronic clinical data collection across multiple sites, and reconciling clinicians' willingness to infer unstated but 'obvious' diagnoses with the machine's inability to do the same.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 53 (496)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 53, Issue 496
November 2003
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Automated quality checks on repeat prescribing.
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Automated quality checks on repeat prescribing.
Jeremy E Rogers, Christopher J Wroe, Angus Roberts, Angela Swallow, David Stables, Judith A Cantrill, Alan L Rector
British Journal of General Practice 2003; 53 (496): 838-844.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Automated quality checks on repeat prescribing.
Jeremy E Rogers, Christopher J Wroe, Angus Roberts, Angela Swallow, David Stables, Judith A Cantrill, Alan L Rector
British Journal of General Practice 2003; 53 (496): 838-844.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional education.
  • The role of primary care in the prevention of suicide and accidental deaths among young men: an epidemiological study.
  • A primary care intervention programme for obesity and coronary heart disease risk factor reduction.
Show more Research Article

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

Tweets by @BJGPjournal

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242