Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Back Pages

Centres of excellence verus community critical care

Patrick Trust
British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54 (502): 397.
Patrick Trust
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

THE general surgeon is dead — long live the general surgeon. Sadly unlike royalty, consultants' continuity of care in communities has gone forever if you observe what is happening across the UK. Like a bad ‘spaghetti western’ surgeons have corralled themselves under attack into so-called centres of excellence waiting for the ‘blue lights’ to arrive. Patients are now starting to let politicians know how much local health care is valued by voting, and some consultants are working with patient groups and primary care colleagues to preserve local care.

The leading article in the BMJ on reconfiguration of critical care services in the UK1 struck a chord with me, being full of common sense with suggestions for possible ways forward. Coming from an area where our local district general hospital (DGH) is shutting services, first maternity, then emergency surgery and now A&E, I felt the need to express my disappointment and frustration with the collapse of much valued local services. Taking a step back, the big picture is looking much the same for all small DGHs and rural communities throughout the UK.2 All 16 general practices in Lomond LHCC have been united in attempting to preserve services for our population since June 2003. Some imaginative thinking by GP, nursing and ambulance colleagues has enabled our ‘out of hours’ team to expand and take over the care of minor injuries overnight. It is disappointing to find less than whole-hearted support from our health board who will only finance the service on a 3–monthly basis, while spending over £3 million on enlarging surgical services 20 miles away. Our consultant colleagues, with a few notable exceptions, now see the closure of our local high dependency unit will mean acute medicine, Xray and laboratory follow close behind. Small wonder that the local population is up in arms and hugely concerned to preserve local hospital services, as are patients in Fort William to the north.3 Patients are the losers with local service cuts by centralisation as travel is expensive and inconvenient. Important groups, such as the police, are not even consulted over proposed changes.

The blame for centralisation is attributed to the specialism in surgical services following the Calman training scheme and the European Working Time Directive. Surgeons are now realising that the new training gives very little ‘cutting time’ but the latest report from the Senate of Surgery is recognising the public's concerns: at least the summary of requirements for services in the UK and Ireland states the need for more surgeons to work more flexibly.4 The problem for GPs at present is that there are not enough of us to cover the retreating surgeons while we do our normal daily work. We will all have to wait many years for any additional GPs and surgeons to emerge on the workshop floor. So maybe the surgeons are going to ‘think out of the box’ but statements like ‘minor injury units have no place in treating the severely ill or injured patient’ are not appropriate when it takes over an hour to reach the local ‘centre of excellence’. Thus all the GPs in rural Argyll have ‘BASICS’ (British Association for Immediate Care) training and patients should be assessed and stabilised before transfer on to major centres many miles away by ‘blue-light ambulance’.5

Teamwork is the answer to our immediate problems. New generalists are relying increasingly on our nursing colleagues with our receptionists and managers using information technology to provide the majority of care for chronic disease management. Centralists must realise that the public will not accept the burden of travelling many miles for services that should be provided locally. I hope the new generalists can help patients to retain the local services that are appropriate to an advanced European country in the 21st century.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2004.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Black A
    (2004) Reconfiguration of surgical, emergency, and trauma services in the UK. BMJ 328:178–179.
  2. ↵
    1. Rapid Responses to above
    , www.bmj.com/cgi/eletters/328/7433/178 (accessed 31 Mar 2004).
  3. ↵
    1. The Belford Action Group
    , www.tbag.org.uk (accessed 31 Mar 2004).
  4. ↵
    1. Senate of Surgery of Great Britain and Ireland
    (2004) Reconfiguration of surgical, accident and emergency and trauma services in the UK (Senate of Surgery Secretariat, Glasgow) www.rcpsg.ac.uk/recreport.htm (accessed 31 Mar 2004).
  5. ↵
    1. BASICS in Scotland
    , http://www.ski-injury.com/basics.htm (accessed 31 Mar 2004).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 54 (502)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 54, Issue 502
May 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Centres of excellence verus community critical care
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Centres of excellence verus community critical care
Patrick Trust
British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54 (502): 397.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Centres of excellence verus community critical care
Patrick Trust
British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54 (502): 397.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • References
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

The Back Pages

  • How to protect general practice from child protection
  • Who Is My Patient?
  • Working with vulnerable families in deprived areas
Show more The Back Pages

viewpoint

  • The NHS: have the rivets popped?
  • Bring Hippocrates to the people and save the NHS
  • Getting the swagger back into general practice
Show more viewpoint

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242