Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Advertisement
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Back Pages

No such thing as normal

Neville Goodman
British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54 (503): 487.
Neville Goodman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

ANAESTHETISTS don't have many drugs. And those we have are steadily being taken away. We used to have an effective antiemetic — not that any antiemetic is really effective, but droperidol was the best we had. Maintenance doses for psychosis caused prolonged QT syndrome and it had to go. It was cheap and we anaesthetists used only a tiny dose once or twice per patient, so it was not worth making and we don't have it any more. We used to have methoxamine, an α-agonist useful for treating acute hypotension: gone —uneconomic. We replaced it with an alternative, metaraminol, but now that and another α-agonist, phenylephrine, are in short supply so we are urged to use them only when essential. Is that when the systolic blood pressure is 81 mmHg? Or should we wait until it's 79 mmHg?

I anaesthetised a chap the other day who was taking tralindopril. I'd never heard of it, though clearly it's an ACE inhibitor. I'd heard of captopril and enalapril; a lot of our renal patients are on perindopril; but there are 11 ACE inhibitors in the BNF. Eleven! We have difficulty getting hold of a simple cheap vasopressor that works, and there are 11 ACE inhibitors available to drop the blood pressure even further. The BNF makes no distinction between them: before listing each one, the advice refers generically to ‘ACE inhibitors’ or ‘an ACE inhibitor’. In a quick look at Medline for studies comparing ACE inhibitors one with another, the first two that turned up were for ACE inhibitors not (yet) in the BNF.

ACE inhibitors, according to the BNF, are second line to diuretics and ß-blockers, and I came across a Swedish study concluding that old drugs are just as good as new drugs at reducing the blood pressure in hypertension (there aren't enough data on long-term outcomes for many of the ACE inhibitors).

There are enough ACE inhibitors — we'll ignore all the other antihypertensives for the moment — and enough sub-groups (diabetics, diabetics with renal failure, patients who have already had a myocardial infarction, diabetics who have already had a myocardial infarction …) for controlled trials in hypertension to continue forever until complexity theory, the law of diminishing returns, or boredom stop them. And with a blood pressure of 120/80 now described as ‘pre-hypertension’ (just as skin is now described as ‘pre-melanoma’: see www.gruntdoc.com) there will soon be a cool ACE inhibitor for the yoof market, pre-packaged with ecstasy.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2004.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 54 (503)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 54, Issue 503
June 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
No such thing as normal
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
No such thing as normal
Neville Goodman
British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54 (503): 487.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
No such thing as normal
Neville Goodman
British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54 (503): 487.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • How to protect general practice from child protection
  • Who Is My Patient?
  • Working with vulnerable families in deprived areas
Show more The Back Pages

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242