Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Response

Tony Mathie
British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54 (505): 625.
Tony Mathie
Roles: Council Member and Freemason
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

It was always going to be the case that an offer of a donation from the Freemason's Grand Charity would polarise opinion and this short letter is unlikely to alter entrenched views. However, there are some important general points to be considered. The democratically elected College Council has, by a large majority, agreed to take consideration of this idea forward. The College has very clear guidelines about accepting donations and this offer is within those guidelines. To reject such an offer on grounds outside the guidelines would be to repudiate those guidelines. Freemasonry is perfectly legal and in the view of many is at worst harmless and at best respectable. The Grand Charity is itself a registered charity and, like the College, must work within the rules set by the Charity Commissioners. To equate the Grand Charity with a drug baron is frankly offensive. Every year thousands of ordinary freemasons give money to the Grand Charity in the belief that it will assist worthy causes. The idea that the upper echelons of freemasonry exist in a shadow world of plotting and intrigue will, I am sure, be news to HRH The Duke of Kent, who is the Grand Master, and to the numerous bishops and archbishops who have graced the order.

Freemasonry is certainly a society with secrets but since there have been a number of reasonably accurate televised exposures and since any member of the public can order books from any bookseller that deal with freemasonry in detail, it is hardly a secret society. Furthermore, most masonic halls have open days and are available for use by members of the public. The sort of blood-curdling oaths referred to in Chris Barry's letter were commonplace in all sorts of organisations when the masonic ritual was written several centuries ago but they have long been removed and are now of only historical interest.

I believe that the College needs to be very careful before passing judgements on organisations based on hearsay and incomplete understanding. The College officers have carefully investigated the Freemason's Grand Charity and the Council appeared to be much more anxious about appearing unreasonably prejudiced than about joining the Royal College of Surgeons in considering, and possibly accepting, money from this source.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2004.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 54 (505)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 54, Issue 505
August 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Response
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Response
Tony Mathie
British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54 (505): 625.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Response
Tony Mathie
British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54 (505): 625.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • An earlier diagnosis of heart failure
  • Group A strep: has point-of-care testing for primary care finally come of age?
  • Author response
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242