Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Advertisement
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Back Pages

Burundi: a population deprived of basic health care

Mit Philips, Gorik Ooms, Sally Hargreaves and Andrew Durrant
British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54 (505): 634-635.
Mit Philips
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Gorik Ooms
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sally Hargreaves
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Andrew Durrant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Civilians in Burundi have lived through years of conflict and are currently in a state of chronic crisis. Although a ceasefire was agreed at the end of 2003, in certain areas of Burundi peace still remains a hope rather than a reality and the effects of war are still very much present.1 The country's civil war has compounded the economic crisis, and severely damaged the health sector. The government's capacity to invest in the health sector is limited. Medical staff are lacking, infrastructure has been destroyed, and ongoing insecurity in certain regions has increased the inaccessibility of health care for many.2 At the same time, infectious and parasitic diseases, especially malaria, remain huge health problems. Despite the beginnings of political stability in Burundi, the mortality rates are alarming and well above those associated with even an emergency situation.3 The violence has led to a scarcity of goods and services, supply and transport problems, an increase in violence and the destruction of family belongings causing generalised vulnerability of the population.

The link between poverty and health is now well known, and health is recognised as an essential requirement for economic development.4 Yet there are hundreds of thousands of Burundians who have no access to basic health care as a result of their inability to pay for it. This is because since February 2002, the Burundian government have implemented a policy of cost recovery for health services. The cost-recovery system is part of a revived health reform planned before the war. It aims to mobilise extra resources for health care. Faced with only a small part of the national budget allocated to the health sector, the Ministry of Health had no other choice but to impose the burden of healthcare costs on the patient. The cost-recovery system means that the patient has to pay the full price for medicines as well as tests and medical consultations. The system has been applied in 12 of 17 rural provinces — covering 5 million people. In some areas non-governmental organisations (NGOs) subsidise essential care and user fees are lowered for some 750 000 people.

The average price for a basic consultation at a primary healthcare centre under the cost-recovery system is around €=2–3. This is equivalent to about 12 days pay for a Burundian. No effective system exists to protect the destitute, or those unable to afford treatment. In spite of high levels of vulnerability, less than 1% of households obtain a full waiver of the fees. We met Simeon — a man with no money, no job, and a family to feed. He presented to the clinic with a young girl, age 3 years, with second degree burns:

‘I was very worried and I brought my little girl to the health centre in my district in the south of Bukumbura. But the nurse wouldn't see us as I didn't have any money to pay for the consultation. So I had to take my girl back home without having received any care. Then I had no choice but to borrow 2000F (Burundian francs) (€=2) from my neighbours for the consultation. I also bought a few medicines on the black market. Every day I pay back 150F (€=0.15) of the 250F (€=0.25) that I earn every day carrying bags. I have 100F (€=0.10) left to feed my family. It's not a lot.’

Increasingly, humanitarian relief agencies have expressed their concern over the introduction of cost-sharing mechanisms in complex emergencies or post-conflict situations such as in Burundi. It seems unfair to many that a population struggling to survive in a war situation should have a further financial burden imposed on them. According to Poletti,5 the rationale for introducing cost-sharing in complex emergencies has not been well articulated, and the arguments in favour of it are largely ideological. Although the introduction of user fees is seen by donors as a necessary step in building a sustainable health system, there is sufficient evidence to date to suggest that user fees should not be introduced in complex emergency settings as they can have a dramatic effect on the health and social status of the population.5

Against the background of the precarious situation of the majority of Burundians, Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF), who has worked in Burundi since 1992, initiated a nationwide retrospective epidemiological survey from November 2003–January 2004, to assess the effect of nearly 2 years of the cost-recovery system on the Burundian population.3 The results of the survey were alarming: 17% of the population said they had no access to a straightforward consultation, with 82% of these sick people stating that the reason for this was because they didn't have any money to pay. Our findings from the survey translate to almost 1 million people in Burundi, like Simeon, being excluded from basic health care at this time.

In order to pay for health care, 81.5% of patients consulted said they were obliged to go into debt or sell a proportion of their harvest, land, or livestock. Running up a debt with a health centre is a common practice in Burundi. In order to recover debts, centres confiscate identity papers, or some of the patients' belongings. Another measure reported by MSF was the imprisonment of patients, which may leave them inside the health centre, but with no care. Some NGOs and other civil bodies have been known to reimburse all or part of the debt contracted in order to obtain the patients release.

18-year-old Clémentine, from a desperately poor area called Cibitoke, had recently given birth in the health centre.

‘After the delivery I was presented with a bill for 30 900F (around €=30). I didn't have money enough to pay that much. I am an orphan … [My husband] left me when he learned that I had to pay 30 900F for the delivery. As I didn't have anything to pay that amount of money, I was imprisoned in the health centre … I remained there for a week, in detention, without care and without food. It was the other women in the room who shared their food with me and helped me to wash. I was suffering from anaemia and my baby had respiratory and digestive problems.’

Besides the exclusion and the risk of further impoverishment, the delays in attending a consultation for a health problem are a concern. Since the introduction of the system, the survey highlighted that attendance rates at the health centres have fallen off sharply. Mainly for financial reasons, most households postpone seeking health care. This means that patients may be presenting later to services, possibly to the detriment of their health. This practice could be one of the factors explaining the significantly higher mortality rates for malaria that have been observed in regions affected by the cost-recovery system.

The population of Burundi is living in extreme poverty and the expenditure on health care is further exacerbating this precarious state. To impose a cost-recovery system on a population emerging from 10 years of civil war is unjust. It is imperative that an effective and free healthcare system is urgently restored in Burundi, and that services are accessible to all. The human price of this cost-recovery system must provoke a reaction among the relevant bodies, with dialogue needed around alternative ways of financing health services to avoid exclusion.

During a Westminster Hall debate on Burundi,6 in response to questioning on whether appropriate exemptions from the cost-recovery scheme could be made for vulnerable elements of the Burundian population, the Parliamentary Undersecretary of State for International Development stated that DFID's priority was, ‘to ensure that the poorest of the poor are able to access medical services and for the moment the best way to achieve that is through health services being provided free of charge’.6 MSF is currently in dialogue with DFID Africa Desk to review alternatives to the cost-recovery system in a humanitarian situation.

Burundi today faces a great many challenges. In addition to the real difficulties in guaranteeing access to health care due to the high cost of consultations in public health facilities, aid agencies are still having major difficulties reaching the most vulnerable people. Aid agencies are also searching for ways to handle the massive return of refugees expected later this year.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2004.

References

  1. ↵
    1. Human Rights Watch
    (2003) Everyday victims: civilians in the Burundian war (Human Rights Watch, New York).
  2. ↵
    1. Médecins Sans Frontières
    (2004) Burundi: vulnerable population deprived of access to healthcare (Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels).
  3. ↵
    1. Médecins Sans Frontières
    (2004) Access to health care in Burundi: results of three epidemiological surveys (Médecins Sans Frontières, Brussels).
  4. ↵
    1. World Health Organisation, CMH Support Unit
    (2002) Investing in Health: a summary of the findings of the Commission on Macroeconomics and Health (World Health Organisation, Geneva).
  5. ↵
    1. Poletti T
    (2004) Cost-recovery in the health sector: an inappropriate policy in complex emergencies. Humanitarian Exchange 26:19–22.
  6. ↵
    1. Hansard (House of Commons Debates)
    (2004) Westminster Hall Debates for 5 May 2004 (HMSO, London) http://www.parliament.the-stationery-office.co.uk/pa/cm200304/cmhansrd/cm040505/halltext/40505h04.htm#40505h04_spmin0 (accessed 5 Jul 2004).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 54 (505)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 54, Issue 505
August 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Burundi: a population deprived of basic health care
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Burundi: a population deprived of basic health care
Mit Philips, Gorik Ooms, Sally Hargreaves, Andrew Durrant
British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54 (505): 634-635.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Burundi: a population deprived of basic health care
Mit Philips, Gorik Ooms, Sally Hargreaves, Andrew Durrant
British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54 (505): 634-635.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • References
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

The Back Pages

  • How to protect general practice from child protection
  • Who Is My Patient?
  • Working with vulnerable families in deprived areas
Show more The Back Pages

news

  • EDO — encore
  • Heroes and villains
  • 33rd Annual Scientific Meeting of the Society for Academic Primary Care
Show more news

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242