Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Back Pages

From the journals, July 2004

British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54 (506): 719.
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

New Eng J Med Vol 351

33 Why does blood pressure go up in some people? Despite a century of research, we're still left using terms like ‘essential’, ‘idiopathic’ and ‘primary’ to hide our ignorance. The level of aldosterone is probably part of the story: people in the highest quartile were the most likely to become hypertensive in this study from Framingham.

125 Yet another conundrum to do with prostate specific antigen (PSA): if it increases by more than 2 ng/ml per year, your patient may well have micro-metastases, and will probably not be cured by radical local treatment.

241 Pregnancy increases the demand for thyroxine almost immediately, so that women on replacement treatment need a dose increase of 30% right away.

354 ‘Don't worry, it's just a virus: take these tablets for a few days to get you over the worst.’ The management of labyrinthitis, as performed with dizzying skill by most of us: but which tablets should we really be using? Probably oral corticosteroids, according to this study, which also used valaciclovir in two of its arms: the antiviral made no difference, but methylprednisolone hastened recovery.

427 As a screening tool for women at high risk of breast cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) proved better than mammography in this Dutch study.

Lancet Vol 364

249 Was all that endless cervical screening over the last three decades worthwhile? Probably, at £36k per life saved, according to this modelling exercise.

263 Challenge your local rheumatologists to provide a rapid access service, using this paper (the TICORA study) to show that it can be done without extra cost, but with considerable patient benefit.

365 A study that confirms the high level of protection against meningococcal serogroup C disease achieved by the current conjugate vaccine.

423 At a time when the new contract is making us do some serious homework on chronic disease management, here's a Nottingham study showing just how bad we are at looking after our diet-controlled diabetics.

428 Ever tried to develop a clinical guideline with a local specialist? Here's an interesting large study of how the process actually takes place, using a variety of models.

JAMA Vol 292

65 As we flounder about trying to help women who have had to give up hormone replacement therapy, there's a strong temptation to recommend products containing soy isoflavones. But they do nothing for bone density, cognitive function or lipid profile in women over 60 years old. It's soy depressing.

338 Many readers less Luddite than Theophrastus will have taken part in the UK GP Research Database project in the 1990s: here it is trawled for information about the risk of suicide following prescription of dosulepin, amitriptyline, fluoxetine and paroxetine. The study finds little difference.

351 Can MMR vaccine cause febrile convulsions, especially in high risk children? Yes, but very rarely.

366 A useful summary of the evidence on which treatments best prevent exacerbations in adult asthma. Low-dose inhaled steroids still top the bill.

442 Calculating risk in women with a family history of breast cancer is something a computer does quite well: but patients still prefer to see a genetic counsellor to talk things over.

Other Journals

In all grades of heart failure, β-adrenergic blockers have been shown to improve survival, at least as much as ACE inhibitors, but we are all scared of using them. Arch Intern Med (164: 1389) looks at the adverse effects described in the randomised trials for heart failure and finds that more patients were actually withdrawn from placebo than from β-blockers. On page 1395 there is a meta-analysis which shows that drugs can help weight loss in type 2 diabetes, but their effect on long-term outcomes is unknown. Ann Intern Med (141: 16) tackles the tricky subject of how much true cross-reactivity there is between penicillins and cephalosporins in allergic patients: about 10%, if there has been a true reaction and a positive skin test.

Pediatrics (114: e96) is a Canadian study comparing azithromycin with erythromycin for the treatment of whooping cough. It works as well and is better tolerated. On page 217 is a discussion of bariatric surgery for severely overweight adolescents: a worrying prospect. Imagine Charles Dickens' outbursts, had he thought his Fat Boy might end up in the hands of Yankee surgeons.

Plant of the Month: Kirengeshoma palmata

Pale yellow shuttlecock shaped flowers in a shady spot: one of the loveliest late perennials.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2004.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 54 (506)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 54, Issue 506
September 2004
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
From the journals, July 2004
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
From the journals, July 2004
British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54 (506): 719.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
From the journals, July 2004
British Journal of General Practice 2004; 54 (506): 719.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • New Eng J Med Vol 351
    • Lancet Vol 364
    • JAMA Vol 292
    • Other Journals
    • Plant of the Month: Kirengeshoma palmata
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

The Back Pages

  • Development of undergraduate family medicine teaching in China
  • The ethics of listening and responding to patients' narratives: implications for practice
  • How big is your society?
Show more The Back Pages

flora medica theophrastus bombastus

  • From the journals, September and October 2004
  • From the journals, September and October 2004
  • From the journals, August 2004
Show more flora medica theophrastus bombastus

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242