Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
January Focus

January Focus

David Jewell
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (510): 2.
David Jewell
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

‘If you can't communicate, it doesn't matter what you know.’ So says Iain Lawrie, quoting from a book on communication reviewed on page 68. Not everyone agrees.

On page 40 John Skelton quotes an anonymous writer on a BBC website: ‘But what good are doctors who empathise, smile and maintain eye contact if they do not know their stuff?’. Of course, we have had numerous debates of this nature in the last 20 years; part of Skelton's thesis is that we are hamstrung by professional attitudes so stuck in the past that the research into communication continues to focus on the glaringly obvious, so that ‘the profession has burdened itself with a low threshold of challenge.’ He ends up challenging us to think more about the attitudes in order to demonstrate the need for skills.

The tension or coherence between knowledge and communication skills, and the need to make the research relevant to contemporary general practice is illustrated by Edwards et al's study on page 6. Here, doctors were trained according to both the best evidence concerning conventional treatment for a number of conditions and the skills required to engage their patients in shared decision making. The results were mixed: readers will be encouraged that the participants in the trial found the skills useful and generalisable to other problems, but the occasions when they could be used were limited — perhaps just as well considering the additional time such consultations took. Phil Hammond's editorial on page 3 warns that everything is going to take much longer, especially what was, until recently, the simple matter of helping patients to understand and agree to all medical procedures.

On page 47 Innes et al explores why surface skills can only take us so far. The models of consultations developed in the 1980s help us to navigate simple interactions, but so many consultations simply don't follow a linear path, and we need models that help us to understand the messy uncertain world in which we so often find ourselves.

One of the difficulties is that whenever we look at a single aspect of the task, we find that there is more to do than we had previously thought. We have all been taught, and have taught others, about the importance of exploring patients' beliefs. All generalists have to equip themselves to work with patients from different cultures, and on page 26 a study of beliefs on the causes of epilepsy illustrates how open-minded we have to be. And before anyone is tempted into a feeling of cultural superiority, they should reflect quite how recently mental illness in the UK was ascribed to possession by evil spirits. Fear and ignorance about mental illness persists elsewhere as much as it does here.

This is also reflected in comments on the importance of the cultural beliefs about mental illness in Armenia on page 64, and how they influence what the doctors can achieve. Finally James Willis on page 72 takes (another) swipe at Advanced Access; he also reminds us that good communication in not just about what goes on in consulting rooms, but also how the whole team, especially receptionists, interacts with the rest of the world.

The BJGP is fundamentally in the business of communication — of science, ideas, letters, reports, anything that we think has any kind of relevance to the world of primary care — and the analogy with communication between doctors and patients is useful. We too need both the content that is worth communicating, and the means to communicate it clearly and effectively. We have always worked at both of these aspects, but one criticism is that the medium — the print itself — has intruded too often. So, for the second time in a short period, we have had the Journal redesigned. This time we think the print is cleaner, there is more white space so it is more restful on the eye, and we think the presentation of data is much better. In the end it is, of course, for readers to judge. But then communication should be a two-way affair and, as always, we should like to encourage lots of feedback — good, bad, and insulting — to swell the letters pages.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2005.
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 55 (510)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 55, Issue 510
January 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
January Focus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
January Focus
David Jewell
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (510): 2.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
January Focus
David Jewell
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (510): 2.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Population Medicine
  • January Focus
  • January Focus
Show more January Focus

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242