Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Back Pages

SARS: LESSONS TO LEARN FOR GPs WHEN HANDLING A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS

William CW Wong, Samuel YS Wong, Liisa Jaakkimainen, Susan Bondy, Kwong KA Tsang and Albert Lee
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (510): 57.
William CW Wong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Samuel YS Wong
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Liisa Jaakkimainen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Bondy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kwong KA Tsang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Albert Lee
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) took the world by surprise and caught many health professionals off guard. On a positive note, this novel infection has uncovered many flaws and, inevitably, highlighted where reforms in our healthcare delivery systems need to be made. There were many similarities on the handling of SARS and the impact it had in Canada and Hong Kong:1 both places had never faced an epidemic that took such a direct toll on healthcare workers. Surveillance and warning systems were inadequate in preventing the outbreaks in both places. Their clinical and public health systems were not readily prepared for an emerging infectious disease outbreak.

The Chinese University of Hong Kong and University of Toronto carried out a postal survey on 183 and 150 academic GPs in May–June 2003 with 75% and 34% response rate, respectively. The results showed that doctors from Hong Kong were much more likely to order blood tests and/or chest x-ray (odds ratio [OR] = 37.8, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.65 to 113.06), whereas doctors from Toronto were more likely to wait longer for the results (OR = 50, 95% CI = 16.7 to 100). In addition, doctors from Canada were much more likely to experience appointment delays or cancellations (specialists OR = 20, 95% CI = 9.1 to 50; surgery OR = 6.25, 95% CI = 3.2 to 12.5) or difficulties in making specialist referrals (OR = 14.3, 95% CI = 7.1 to 33.3).

Generally speaking, GPs have the role of gate-keeping for hospital care, but in Hong Kong 70% of primary care is provided by the private sector, whereas 90% of hospital care is carried out in public institutions.2 There is little interface between primary and secondary care, let alone collaborations between the private and public sectors. In the fear and panic created by SARS, many private doctors in the community found it difficult to manage patients with common symptoms, such as fever or cough, without resorting to many unnecessary investigations. If GPs in Hong Kong had direct access to basic diagnostic procedures and support from hospital staff, they could screen suspected cases more effectively, avoiding extra strain in the overstretched public health system. On the other hand, the health care in Canada is provided through provincially administered universal health insurance plans with no parallel private systems. Thus, overwhelming cancellations and delays in appointments and laboratory results were evident when there was no surge capacity in a public health crisis.3

One of the ways forward is the establishment of private–public partnership, for example, sharing clinical information; outsourcing clinical support (laboratory or radiology) services; preventive services, such as contraceptive, childhood immunisation, and developmental surveillance; and specialised clinical services, such as antenatal or chronic disease care or even private management of public hospitals. Not only will this allow additional resources for health at a time when they are scarce, but private institutions can bring with them better management and marketing skills to complement the social commitment of the public sector. Another advantage is that the quality of health and allied services are likely to be improved because the monopoly for provision of goods and services by the public sector will be replaced with competition among different participants. This will ensure that resources are allocated more efficiently, with those able to pay using private services, while public resources are targeted to reach those who cannot pay. We believe that this new model will be seen as a ‘win–win’ arrangement in which diverse players with varied motivations and philosophies of work will get together and be able to fufil different health needs and contribute to better health of the people.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2005.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Naylor CD,
    2. Chantler C,
    3. Griffiths S
    (2004) Learning from SARS in Hong Kong and Toronto. JAMA 291(20):2483–2487.
  2. ↵
    1. Lee A
    (1998) Seamless health care for chronic diseases in dual health care system: managed care and role of family physicians. J Manag Med 12:398–405.
  3. ↵
    1. Health Canada
    Learning from SARS: renewal of public health in Canada, http:/www.hc-sc.gc.ca/english/protection/warnings/sars/learning.html (accessed 2 Dec 2004).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 55 (510)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 55, Issue 510
January 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
SARS: LESSONS TO LEARN FOR GPs WHEN HANDLING A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
SARS: LESSONS TO LEARN FOR GPs WHEN HANDLING A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS
William CW Wong, Samuel YS Wong, Liisa Jaakkimainen, Susan Bondy, Kwong KA Tsang, Albert Lee
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (510): 57.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
SARS: LESSONS TO LEARN FOR GPs WHEN HANDLING A PUBLIC HEALTH CRISIS
William CW Wong, Samuel YS Wong, Liisa Jaakkimainen, Susan Bondy, Kwong KA Tsang, Albert Lee
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (510): 57.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

The Back Pages

  • Evidence-based medicine and Web 2.0: friend or foe?
  • Tips for GP trainees working in obstetrics and gynaecology
  • How to protect general practice from child protection
Show more The Back Pages

viewpoint

  • The NHS: have the rivets popped?
  • Bring Hippocrates to the people and save the NHS
  • Getting the swagger back into general practice
Show more viewpoint

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242