Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Advertisement
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Back Pages

Another one bites the dust

Neville Goodman
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (511): 159.
Neville Goodman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Without the fanfare that accompanied its birth, the idea of the NHS University quietly faded away as 2004 drew to a close. It was always a barmy idea (this column, December 2001) that everyone from cleaners to consultants would be trained, if not under the same roof, then by the same organisation. The Guardian described the NHS University as a ‘brainchild’ of Alan Milburn, and the death of this child will, according to the Guardian's headline, be part of the health service's savings of £500 million per year. Which is all very well, but even more money would have been saved if sense had taken precedence over ill-judged enthusiasm in the first place. Other ‘savings’ will come from the axing (the Guardian's word) of the NHS Modernisation Agency. I visited the Agency's headquarters in Leicester a couple of years ago. They were impressive. Airy, smart, nice carpets, the latest computer publishing equipment: everything you could need for getting out the government's message. I was given a glossy booklet full of examples of how we could learn from examples of good practice. I was stirred by the story of a group of specialist diabetic nurses, who realised they would be more efficient if they had more than one blood sugar monitor between the eight of them.

Every political party in opposition draws up plans to ‘cut red tape’ only the government can create its own bureaucracy and then claim credit for cutting it. The remnants of the Modernisation Agency and the University will be incorporated in a new body, the NHS Institute for Learning Skills and Innovation. This body, lovingly known as NILSI, comes into being in July 2005. It will also subsume the NHS Leadership Centre, a body that I didn't know existed.

Are any of these bodies needed? I just don't know. But it does not give me confidence when health minister John Hutton, speaking of what NILSI will do, talks of ‘implementing the concept of the skills escalator’. Why only implement the concept? Why not implement the actual escalator? And I presume he means the up-escalator.

While we all want (though might phrase it differently) ‘a health service where everyone is allowed to learn, develop and progress to the best of their potential’, there is no getting away from the need for menial tasks. No matter how many degrees and NVQs our staff have, floors need cleaning and patients need moving. And those staff too must be valued, not made to think that, for them, it is progress or failure.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2005.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 55 (511)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 55, Issue 511
February 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Another one bites the dust
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Another one bites the dust
Neville Goodman
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (511): 159.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Another one bites the dust
Neville Goodman
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (511): 159.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • How to protect general practice from child protection
  • Who Is My Patient?
  • Working with vulnerable families in deprived areas
Show more The Back Pages

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242