Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Original Papers

Variations in antibiotic prescribing and consultation rates for acute respiratory infection in UK general practices 1995–2000

Mark Ashworth, Judith Charlton, Karen Ballard, Radoslav Latinovic and Martin Gulliford
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (517): 603-608.
Mark Ashworth
Roles: STaRNet Lead General Practitioner and Honorary Senior Lecturer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Judith Charlton
Roles: Research Assistant
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Karen Ballard
Roles: Lecturer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Radoslav Latinovic
Roles: Database Manager
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Martin Gulliford
Roles: Senior Lecturer in Public Health Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

    • View popup
    Table 1

    Practice-specific antibiotic and consultation data: crude and standardised values for 108 general practices in 1997.

    Distribution of practice specific values
    Lowest practice25th centileMedian practice75th centileHighest practiceCorrelation coefficientaP-value
    All respiratory infectionsPrescriptions per 100 consultations (n)4572788698
    Consultations per 1000 registered patients (n)12531938851711100.414<0.001
    Standardised prescribing ratio (%)5893102110126
    Standardised consultation ratio (%)318095127261
    Ear infectionPrescriptions per 100 consultations (n)46808793100
    Consultations per 1000 registered patients (n)12333511000.418<0.001
    Standardised prescribing ratio (%)5593100107115
    Standardised consultation ratio (%)46387130238
    Sinus infectionPrescriptions per 100 consultations (n)46899295100
    Consultations per 1000 registered patients (n)0132232510.1650.090
    Standardised prescribing ratio (%)5296100104109
    Standardised consultation ratio (%)05489133323
    Sore throatPrescriptions per 100 consultations (n)1562768599
    Consultations per 1000 registered patients (n)43656783310.386<0.001
    Standardised prescribing ratio (%)2081100111131
    Standardised consultation ratio (%)66290125556
    TonsillitisPrescriptions per 100 consultations (n)31869194100
    Consultations per 1000 registered patients (n)11927391140.2640.006
    Standardised prescribing ratio (%)3596101105111
    Standardised consultation ratio (%)26284127307
    Upper respiratory tract infection — site not specifiedPrescriptions per 100 consultations (n)2446586100
    Consultations per 1000 registered patients (n)452901579310.444<0.001
    Standardised prescribing ratio (%)36797127157
    Standardised consultation ratio (%)34681140687
    Common coldPrescriptions per 100 consultations (n)07132584
    Consultations per 1000 registered patients (n)048161060.339<0.001
    Standardised prescribing ratio (%)03355117378
    Standardised consultation ratio (%)03972132869
    InfluenzaPrescriptions per 100 consultations (n)014336197
    Consultations per 1000 registered patients (n)0410154570.2210.022
    Standardised prescribing ratio (%)03167126210
    Standardised consultation ratio (%)032721103383
    LaryngitisPrescriptions per 100 consultations (n)6506782100
    Consultations per 1000 registered patients (n)0357190.0730.467
    Standardised prescribing ratiob (%)1280109127199
    Standardised consultation ratio (%)05088133378
    Tracheitis/bronchitisPrescriptions per 100 consultations (n)52788893100c
    Consultations per 1000 registered patients (n)0917352370.2670.006
    Standardised prescribing ratioc (%)588899105145
    Standardised consultation ratio (%)03161125904
    Chest infectionPrescriptions per 100 consultations (n)32818892100d
    Consultations per 1000 registered patients (n)11844795280.340<0.001
    Standardised prescribing ratio (%)369299103133
    Standardised consultation ratio (%)23174125951
    • ↵a Correlation coefficient for association of SCR with SPR.

    • ↵b Based on 102 practices with non-zero consultations.

    • ↵c Based on 107 practices with non-zero consultations.

    • ↵d Figure capped at 100%; actual figures appear to exceed 100% because of double counting when both a penicillin and non-penicillin antibiotic were prescribed. SCR = sex-standardised consultation ratio. SPR = standardised prescription ratio.

    • View popup
    Table 2

    Changes in the proportion of consultations for acute respiratory infections resulting in a prescription (mean SPR) and changes in consultation rate (mean SCR) between 1995 and 2000.

    199519961997199819992000Annual change in SPR or SCR (95% CI)Correlation of SCR change with SPR changeP-value
    All respiratory infections
     SPR101102100958989−3.0 (−3.6 to −2.3)0.2660.005
     SCR116106105958068−9.5 (−11.3 to −7.8)
    • SCR = sex-standardised consultation ratio. SPR = standardised prescription ratio.

Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 55 (517)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 55, Issue 517
August 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Variations in antibiotic prescribing and consultation rates for acute respiratory infection in UK general practices 1995–2000
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Variations in antibiotic prescribing and consultation rates for acute respiratory infection in UK general practices 1995–2000
Mark Ashworth, Judith Charlton, Karen Ballard, Radoslav Latinovic, Martin Gulliford
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (517): 603-608.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Variations in antibiotic prescribing and consultation rates for acute respiratory infection in UK general practices 1995–2000
Mark Ashworth, Judith Charlton, Karen Ballard, Radoslav Latinovic, Martin Gulliford
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (517): 603-608.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHOD
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • antibiotics
  • de-medicalisation
  • illness behaviour
  • prescriptions, drug
  • referral and consultation

More in this TOC Section

  • How people present symptoms to health services: a theory-based content analysis
  • Central or local incident reporting? A comparative study in Dutch GP out-of-hours services
  • Screening of testicular descent in older boys is worthwhile: an observational study
Show more Original Papers

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242