Am I alone in thinking that the tables accompanying the original research articles in the August journal (Vol 55, issue 517) were heavy going? Particularly when trying to illustrate symptom prevalence changes over time (page 599), I would very much like a pretty picture rather than a table (albeit a cheery yellow). What is the BJGP's policy on the use of illustrations and graphics? Or have I just revealed myself to be a lightweight and rather uncritical reader?
- © British Journal of General Practice, 2005.
