Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Referrals for cataract and Action on cataracts, evidence-based guidelines

Stephen C Lash and Catherine Prendiville
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (521): 965-966.
Stephen C Lash
Roles: Specialist Registrar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Catherine Prendiville
Roles: Senior House Officer
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The most common referrals made to ophthalmology units are for cataract with the majority of patients referred from the optometrist via the GP.1–3 Increasingly we have direct referral from optometrists. We audited our referrals for cataract to assess the information included in the referrals and the outcomes in terms of listing for surgery and reasons for not listing.

We received 412 cataract referrals over a 2-month period, of which 15% (n = 62) were referred by the GP. Our ‘gold standard’ for information was taken from the document Action on cataracts,4 in which recommendations were made that cataract was the cause of visual loss, that this visual loss resulted in a detrimental effect on the patients lifestyle and the patient was willing to have surgery. The ‘gold standard’ was reached in 9.7% of referrals from GPs, 8.1% only included willingness for surgery, 3.2% only included effect on lifestyle and 79% just stated the presence of cataract. The overall listing rate for GP referrals was 72.5%. Analysing the full data set of referrals revealed that referrals containing the ‘gold standard’ information resulted in higher listing rates (85.2% [P = 0.029]) compared to referrals just stating the presence of cataract (75.8% [P = 0.716]).

Of the 17 GP referred patients not listed, the most common reasons were patient declining surgery (41% [n = 7]) and no effect on lifestyle (29% [n = 5]). These results were consistent with the full data set with no effect on lifestyle accounting for 41.5% (n = 32) and a further 9.1% (n = 7) of patients declining surgery. Other ocular pathology including macular degeneration 14% (n = 11) and glaucoma 5% (n = 4) accounted for relatively few patients not being listed for surgery.

GPs do not generally have access to slit lamps and fundus biomicroscopy and understandably may feel out of their depth. However, we have shown that when assessing the patient with cataract it is important to assess the effect on the patient's lifestyle and their willingness for surgery before referral, and would encourage all GPs to do this to reduce the number of patients referred prematurely for their cataract operation.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2005.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Lash SC
    (2003) Assessment of information included on the GOS 18 referral form used by optometrists. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 23(1):21–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Pooley JE,
    2. Frost EC
    (1999) Optometrists' referrals to the hospital eye service. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 19(Suppl 1):S16–S24.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Desai P,
    2. Reidy A,
    3. Minassian DC
    (1999) Profile of patients presenting for cataract surgery in the UK: national data collection. Br J Ophthalmol 83:893–896.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. NHS Executive
    (2000) Action on cataracts: good practice guidance (Department of Health, London) www.dh.gov.uk/assetRoot/04/01/45/14/04014514.pdf (accessed 9 November 2005.).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 55 (521)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 55, Issue 521
December 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Referrals for cataract and Action on cataracts, evidence-based guidelines
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Referrals for cataract and Action on cataracts, evidence-based guidelines
Stephen C Lash, Catherine Prendiville
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (521): 965-966.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Referrals for cataract and Action on cataracts, evidence-based guidelines
Stephen C Lash, Catherine Prendiville
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (521): 965-966.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • NICE guidelines traffic light system in children in general practice
  • Author response
  • Parity at last: a new funding model for undergraduate primary care education in England
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242