Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Back Pages

Evidence in practice — number 8. What is the prognosis of optic neuritis?

How often does it lead to multiple sclerosis?

Sharon Sanders, Chris Del Mar, Sarah Purdy, Annelise Spinks, Lisa Tait and Brian McAvoy
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (521): 972-973.
Sharon Sanders
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Chris Del Mar
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Sarah Purdy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Annelise Spinks
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Lisa Tait
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Brian McAvoy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Clinical question — What is the chance of developing multiple sclerosis following the first episode of optic neuritis in a 19-year-old male?

This question was asked of us at the Centre for General Practice, University of Queensland, Australia, where we were providing a literature-search service in collaboration with the Department of Primary Health Care at the University of Newcastle, funded through the NHS Northern and Yorkshire Regional Library Advisory Service, for local GPs. The service was based on an Australian model.1

We present our response to one of the questions asked, updating the original search July 2005.

SEARCH QUESTION

First, the clinical question was reformatted into a ‘searchable question’.2 What is the risk of developing clinically apparent multiple sclerosis following a first episode of optic neuritis in a young male?

The ideal study to answer this question would be an inception cohort study of adults experiencing a first episode of optic neuritis over several years, with minimal loss to follow-up, and the development of clinically apparent multiple sclerosis as the outcome.

RAPID SEARCH

We searched Medline (on SilverPlatter via WebSpirs) for articles published in English using the following terms ‘optic neuritis’ (MeSH and text) AND ‘multiple sclerosis’ (MeSH and text) combined with a sensitive search filter for detecting clinically sound prognostic studies.3

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

There were many studies evaluating the risk of developing multiple sclerosis after a single episode of optic neuritis.4–13 Their quality was good, although there may have been differential measurement causing bias (people with positive brain MRIs may have been less likely to have been lost to follow up, for example).

The risk of developing multiple sclerosis after an episode of optic neuritis ranged from 13 to 58%. Even with brain lesions identified at baseline, only slightly more than half of patients later developed clinical multiple sclerosis, although their absence did not eliminate the risk (0–22%).

Abnormal brain MRI were a strong predictor of multiple sclerosis in the largest study (optic neuritis trial), with 87% complete follow-up, the presence of one or more white matter lesions on baseline MRI brain scan more than doubled the 10-year risk of multiple sclerosis.4

COMMENT

The variation in results may be attributable to differences in study design, variation in criteria for the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis, and length of follow-up. The studies give a reasonably robust indication of the prognosis.

The prognosis seems to be better than expected, and raises questions about whether optic neuritis may have other causes than the demyelination of multiple sclerosis, or that multiple sclerosis has a wide spectrum of expression, often little or never interfering with patients' lives.14

APPLYING THE RESULTS TO THE PATIENT

Apart from offering an overall prognosis, the literature suggests that this can be improved on by testing with MRI for other lesions on diagnosis of optic neuritis.

It also raises the question of treatment. The CHAMPS trial compared interferon β–1a and placebo on developing multiple sclerosis after a single demyelinating event among 192 patients.15 After 3 years, the adjusted rate ratios of clinically definite multiple sclerosis between the two trial arms was 0.58, (95% CI = 0.34 to 1.00). Similarly, in a second randomised placebo controlled trial of interferon ≤β–1a among 309 patients with a first neurologic episode consistent with multiple sclerosis (although in only 35% was this from optic neuritis), clinically apparent multiple sclerosis developed in 34% intervention patients compared with 45% controls.16 But this is a different question …

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2005.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Del Mar CB,
    2. Silagy CA,
    3. Glasziou PP,
    4. et al.
    (2001) Feasibility of an evidence based literature search service for general practitioners. Med J Aust 175(3):134–137.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine
    Focusing clinical questions, http://www.cebm.net/focus_quest.asp (accessed 28 Aug 2005).
  3. ↵
    1. Wilczynski NL,
    2. Haynes RB,
    3. for the Hedges Team
    (2004) Developing optimal search strategies for detecting clinically sound prognostic studies in MEDLINE: an analytic survey. BMC Med 2(1):23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Beck RW,
    2. Trobe JD,
    3. Moke PS,
    4. et al.
    (2003) High- and low-risk profiles for the development of multiple sclerosis within 10 years after optic neuritis: experience of the optic neuritis treatment trial. Arch Ophthalmol 121(7):944–949.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Ghezzi A,
    2. Martinelli V,
    3. Rodegher M,
    4. et al.
    (2000) The prognosis of idiopathic optic neuritis. Neurol Sci 21(4 Suppl 2):S865–S869.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Jin YP,
    2. de Pedro-Cuesta J,
    3. Huang YH,
    4. Soderstrom M
    (2003) Predicting multiple sclerosis at optic neuritis onset. Mult Scler 9(2):135–141.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Nilsson P,
    2. Larsson EM,
    3. Maly-Sundgren P,
    4. et al.
    (2005) Predicting the Outcome of Optic Neuritis Evaluation of risk factors after 30 years of follow-up. J Neurol 252(4):396–402.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Druschky A,
    2. Heckmann JG,
    3. Claus D,
    4. et al.
    (1999) Progression of optic neuritis to multiple sclerosis: an 8-year follow-up study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 101(3):189–192.
    OpenUrlPubMed
    1. Rizzo JF III.,
    2. Lessell S
    (1988) Risk of developing multiple sclerosis after uncomplicated optic neuritis: a long-term prospective study. Neurology 38(2):185–190.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
    1. Frith JA,
    2. McLeod JG,
    3. Hely M
    (2000) Acute optic neuritis in Australia: a 13 year prospective study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 68(2):246.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
    1. Francis DA,
    2. Compston DA,
    3. Batchelor JR,
    4. McDonald WI
    (1987) A reassessment of the risk of multiple sclerosis developing in patients with optic neuritis after extended follow-up. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 50(6):758–765.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
    1. Amirzargar AA,
    2. Tabasi A,
    3. Khosravi F,
    4. et al.
    (2005) Optic neuritis, multiple sclerosis and human leukocyte antigen: results of a 4-year follow-up study. Eur J Neurol 12(1):25–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    1. Tintore M,
    2. Rovira A,
    3. Rio J,
    4. et al.
    (2005) Is optic neuritis more benign than other first attacks in multiple sclerosis? Ann Neurol 57(2):210–215.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    1. Beck RW,
    2. Smith CH,
    3. Gal RL,
    4. et al.
    (2004) Neurologic impairment 10 years after optic neuritis. Arch Neurol 61(9):1386–1389.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. CHAMPS Study Group
    (2001) Interferon beta-1a for optic neuritis patients at high risk for multiple sclerosis. Am J Ophthalmol 132(4):463–471.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  8. ↵
    1. Comi G,
    2. Filippi M,
    3. Wolinsky JS
    (2001) European/Canadian multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study of the effects of glatiramer acetate on magnetic resonance imaging — measured disease activity and burden in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis. European/Canadian Glatiramer Acetate Study Group. Ann Neurol 49(3):290–297.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 55 (521)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 55, Issue 521
December 2005
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Evidence in practice — number 8. What is the prognosis of optic neuritis?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Evidence in practice — number 8. What is the prognosis of optic neuritis?
Sharon Sanders, Chris Del Mar, Sarah Purdy, Annelise Spinks, Lisa Tait, Brian McAvoy
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (521): 972-973.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Evidence in practice — number 8. What is the prognosis of optic neuritis?
Sharon Sanders, Chris Del Mar, Sarah Purdy, Annelise Spinks, Lisa Tait, Brian McAvoy
British Journal of General Practice 2005; 55 (521): 972-973.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • SEARCH QUESTION
    • RAPID SEARCH
    • SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
    • COMMENT
    • APPLYING THE RESULTS TO THE PATIENT
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

The Back Pages

  • The ethics of listening and responding to patients' narratives: implications for practice
  • How big is your society?
  • Evidence-based medicine and Web 2.0: friend or foe?
Show more The Back Pages

Resources

  • EBM, the once and future paradigm
  • Evidence in practice — number 7 Can postpartum depression be prevented?
Show more Resources

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242