Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Advertisement
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Improving consultations in general practice for non English-speaking patients

Margot Jackson and John Skinner
British Journal of General Practice 2006; 56 (529): 627-628.
Margot Jackson
Public Health, Sheffield West Primary Care Trust, Sheffield Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Margot.Jackson@sheffieldw-pct.nhs.uk
John Skinner
Public Health, Sheffield West Primary Care Trust, Sheffield Email:
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Margot.Jackson@sheffieldw-pct.nhs.uk
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Research1,2 has shown that people forget a considerable amount of the information they are given in medical consultations, and that a significant amount of the information that is remembered will be incorrect.3 This can have consequences in terms of compliance with treatment regimes, frequent attendance, DNA rates and staff time in providing reminders and rescheduling appointments.

We piloted the use of digital recording devices (DRDs) in a general practice in Sheffield with a large percentage of Somali patients. All Somali patients needing an interpreter were invited to take part in the study and receive a personalised digital recording of information about their health to take home with them at the end of their consultation with a health professional. Participants were contacted 1 week later by trained interpreters who carried out a telephone questionnaire on acceptability and usage. In total 68 recording devices were given out and 58 people were interviewed.

Of the patients who took part, 81% were women, mainly aged >55 years. Older people and those with memory problems felt that the DRD was useful as they were aware that they forgot many things. The DRDs in this study were used mainly to record information about appointments and medication. People who were interviewed felt that they could be used to record anything that was relevant to their health.

The recording time limits the amount of information that can be stored on the DRDs. One minute is enough to record summary information or details of medication, but if longer explanations are required or a patient is on multiple medications it is not sufficient.

The DRDs can be re-used but their re-use is dependent on patients returning with them at their next appointment. There could be a danger in giving patients multiple devices as messages could get out of date or mixed up. Some form of labelling on the outside of the device could overcome this.

The DRDs used in this pilot were reliable, used frequently and found to be acceptable. It is possible to see that a small investment in DRDs could have an impact on attendance rates and compliance with prescribed medication that, in turn, could contribute to reducing any waste of NHS resources. The cost of the DRDs needs to be considered against the above patient benefits.

Notes

Competing interests

The authors have stated that there are none.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2006.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Goodwin Y
    (2000) Do they listen? A review of information retained by patients following consent for reduction mammoplasty. Br J Plas Surg 53:121–125.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Kessels RPC
    (2003) Patients'memory for medical information. J R Soc Med 96:219–222.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Anderson JL,
    2. Dodman S,
    3. Kopelman M,
    4. Fleming A
    (1979) Patient information recall in a rheumatology clinic. Rheumatol Rehabil 18:18–22.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 56 (529)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 56, Issue 529
August 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Improving consultations in general practice for non English-speaking patients
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Improving consultations in general practice for non English-speaking patients
Margot Jackson, John Skinner
British Journal of General Practice 2006; 56 (529): 627-628.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Improving consultations in general practice for non English-speaking patients
Margot Jackson, John Skinner
British Journal of General Practice 2006; 56 (529): 627-628.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Two-tiered medicine: the increasing disparity in medical care in the UK
  • MRCGP Recorded Consultation Assessment — the hidden fourth construct
  • Prostate-specific antigen testing and opportunistic prostate cancer screening — CAP intervention
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242