Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Systematic Review

The effect of interventions to alter the consultation length of family physicians: a systematic review

Andrew Wilson and Susan Childs
British Journal of General Practice 2006; 56 (532): 876-882.
Andrew Wilson
Roles: Reader in General Practice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Susan Childs
Roles: Researcher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Article Figures & Data

Tables

  • Supplementary Materials
    • View popup
    Table 1

    Characteristics of included studies.

    Study IDMethodsParticipantsInterventionsOutcomesAnalysis
    Morrell 1986CCT. Non-randomised to surgery sessions with 5, 7. 5 or 10 minute appointments1 Practice 5 Doctors 60 Surgery sessions 780 Consultations5, 7.5 and 10 minute appointments (usual appointment, length 6.7 minutes)Consultation length, examination, prescribing and referral, investigation rates, number of problems and psychological problems identified, language content Re-consultation in 4 weeksLogistic regression allowing for age and sex of patient. As case mix varied between groups, doctor and patient initiated consultations were analysed separately for several outcomes
    Ridsdale 1989CCT. Non-randomised to surgery sessions with 5, 10 or 15 minute appointments1 Practice 2 Doctors 914 Consultations5, 10 or 15 minute appointments (usual appointment length 10 minutes)Consultation length, examination, number of problems and psychological problems identified, language content. Re-consultation in 4 weeksRegression, account for age and sex of patient and consulting doctor
    Thomas 1978RCT. Random allocation by participating doctor – method not stated1 Practice 1 Doctor 52 Surgery sessions 200 Patients in whom no diagnosis could be madePatients randomly assigned to 1 of 4 groups: long consultation with or without treatment; short consultation with or without treatment. The participating doctor terminated short consultations as soon as possible and aimed to make the long consultations last for more than 10 minutesRe-consultationχ2
    Wilson 1992CCT. Non-randomised to surgery sessions with examination, prescribing, usual or 10 minute appointments (run in control sessions not included)10 Practices 16 Doctors 208 Surger sessions 2957 Consultations10 minute appointmentsConsultation length, referral and investigation rates, health promotion procedures and examinations. Re-consultationBy patient, no account for clustering by doctor
    • View popup
    Table 2

    Consultation length.

    AuthorAppointment length (mins)Consultations (n) doctor/patient initiatedMedian length (mins) doctor/patient initiatedMean (95% CI)
    Morrell 1986565/1554.3a/5.5
    7.596/1176.4/6.7
    1088/1027.0/7.9
    Ridsdale 19895−/339−/5.96.6 (6.2 to 7.0)
    10−/259−/7.58.0 (7.5 to 8.5)
    15−/316−/7.99.2 (8.6 to 9.8)
    Wilson 19926–7.5−/1496−/6b7.16
    10−/1461−/78.25
    • ↵a Not tested statistically.

    • ↵b (P<0.001 Mann Whitney test).

    • View popup
    Table 3

    Recording of problems, referral investigation, prescribing and re-consultation rate.

    Appointment length in minutes (number of patients included)Consultation with >1 problem (%)Consultation with psychological problem (%)Referred to specialist (%)Investigation (%)Prescribing (%)Re-consultation (%)
    Morrell 1986P<0.01aP NSP NSaP NSaP NSaP NSa
    5 (275)119895916b
    7.5 (262)16149106312
    10 (243)221210106218
    Ridsdale 1989P NSaP NSaP NSaP NSa
    5 (348)148--6130d
    10 (277)198--6329
    15 (336)145--5831
    Wilson 1992 (unpublished results in parentheses)
    P NScP NScP NScP NScP NSc
    6–7.5 (1496)(32)-(5.0)(8.8)55.7(42)d
    10 (1461)(35)-(5.7)(10.6)56.9(46)
    Thomas 1978P NSc
    Short consultation (100)27e
    Long consultation (100)20
    • ↵a χ2 for trend.

    • ↵b Asked to book return consultation.

    • ↵b χ2.

    • ↵d Re-consultation within 12 weeks.

    • ↵e Re-consultation within 4 weeks.

    • NS = Not stated.

    • View popup
    Table 4

    Examinations.

    AuthorDoctor/patient initiatedAppointment length (mins)Consultations n (%)Any examination (%)PBP recordedPVaginal examination (% female consultations)P
    Morrell 1986Doctor58041182
    Doctor7.511755<0.01a27NS10NS
    Doctor10114632910
    Patient51957775
    Patient7.514576NS8NS11NS
    Patient1012969127
    Ridsdale 1989534882223
    1027783NSa17NSa2<0.05a
    1533683167
    Wilson 19926149665bNSc19<0.001
    10146164b24
    • ↵a χ2 for trend.

    • ↵b Unpublished results.

    • ↵c χ2.

    • NS = Not stated.

    • View popup
    Table 5

    Health education/prevention.

    AuthorAppointment length (mins)Eligible consultations nItem present n (%)P
    Roland 1986 (detected on audiotape)522014.5a
    7.521316.9a<0.001b
    1019022.1a
    Wilson 1992 (detected on audiotape)618044 (24.4)NS
    1027578 (28.4)
    Extracted from medical record61432126 (8.8)<0.001c
    101411218 (15.5)
    Current smoker reporting adviced621242 (19.8)<0.01c
    1025882 (31.8)
    Discussion of dietd683995 (11.3)NS
    10950108 (11.4)
    Discussion of alcohold683942 (5.0)NS
    1095667 (7.0)
    • ↵a Percentage consultations in which number of health education statements greater than oversall median percentage consultations with health education.

    • ↵b χ2 for trend.

    • ↵c χ2.

    • ↵d From patient questionnaire.

Supplementary Materials

  • Tables
  • Supplementary Box 1Supplemental Box 1

Supplementary Data

Supplemental Material

Files in this Data Supplement:

  • Supplementary Box 1
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 56 (532)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 56, Issue 532
November 2006
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The effect of interventions to alter the consultation length of family physicians: a systematic review
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The effect of interventions to alter the consultation length of family physicians: a systematic review
Andrew Wilson, Susan Childs
British Journal of General Practice 2006; 56 (532): 876-882.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The effect of interventions to alter the consultation length of family physicians: a systematic review
Andrew Wilson, Susan Childs
British Journal of General Practice 2006; 56 (532): 876-882.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • INTRODUCTION
    • METHOD
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • Supplementary Material
    • Acknowledgments
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

Keywords

  • consultation
  • primary care physicians
  • review, systematic

More in this TOC Section

  • Self-monitoring and other non-pharmacological interventions to improve the management of hypertension in primary care: a systematic review
  • Positive predictive values of ≥5% in primary care for cancer: systematic review
  • Validity of diagnostic coding within the General Practice Research Database: a systematic review
Show more Systematic Review

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242