Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Advertisement
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Back Pages

James McCormick

Tom O'Dowd
British Journal of General Practice 2007; 57 (536): 249.
Tom O'Dowd
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

James McCormick was one of the ‘abominable no-men’ who were critical of medicine's involvement in health screening. He preferred to be known as a sceptic and felt that the role of science in medicine was to place limits on our ignorance and to curb our enthusiasm to do good at all costs.

He was sceptical of the population approach to health and feared coercion of the individual by forces hell-bent on doing good. He had a view that individual patients had a right to harm themselves in the pursuit of happiness, provided they did not harm others. He was supported and indeed influenced by a young Petr Skrabanek for whom he provided a liberal intellectual base in Trinity College, Dublin. His relationship with Skrabanek was rich and fruitful. Neither saw the need to get involved in primary research as they saw themselves moderating the frenetic growth of inadequately conducted studies.

James wrote widely and well, always seeming to fear that what humanity existed would be eroded by poorly thought out science and evidence that disadvantaged the individual. He reserved his admiration for the personal doctor who could tailor medical knowledge to the individual patient. He was critical of general practice research, often citing Marshall Marinker's opinion that it ‘provided predictable answers to banal questions’. Given the choice between wisdom and learning James rated wisdom more highly. Medical education he felt, tended to overvalue training and undervalue education, the cultivation of scholarship, and the critical mind.

We will be putting a selection of his papers on our website later in the year for colleagues who want to read considered, scholarly essays that often swam against the prevailing tide.

His funeral service ended with his own commendation: The timer of my life has nearly run its courseI would the alarm should rudely break the silenceWith no hesitation, with no pause, no lingering doubtAlthough its progress be remorseless and unstopped.I retain the right to hope that time is left,Time to love, time to talkTime to see my children's children grow.(James McCormick, 1999).

He is survived by his wife Biddy, four children, and 12 grandchildren.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2007.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 57 (536)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 57, Issue 536
March 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
James McCormick
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
James McCormick
Tom O'Dowd
British Journal of General Practice 2007; 57 (536): 249.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
James McCormick
Tom O'Dowd
British Journal of General Practice 2007; 57 (536): 249.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

The Back Pages

  • How to protect general practice from child protection
  • Who Is My Patient?
  • Working with vulnerable families in deprived areas
Show more The Back Pages

Appreciation

  • Professor Ian Richardson
  • Cecil Helman: GP, anthropologist, writer, poet, teacher, and internationalist
  • George Godber GCB
Show more Appreciation

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242