Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Women in medicine

Brian McKinstry and Iain Colthart
British Journal of General Practice 2007; 57 (538): 409.
Brian McKinstry
University of Edinburgh, Community Health Sciences: General Practice Section. E-mail:
Roles: Senior Research Fellow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: brian.mckinstry@ed.ac.uk
Iain Colthart
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

We read with interest Amanda Howe's response1 to the papers by Gravelle2 and Rossdale3 in February's Journal. Our own survey of all GPs in Scotland based on a relatively high response rate (67%) found that women GPs at all stages of their careers work significantly fewer hours than men.4 As importantly, they were much less likely to become involved in non-GMS educational and managerial activities (0.73 versus 1.1 sessions weekly, P<0.01) with serious consequences for the development of the speciality.

Additionally, if the Rossdale's findings on out-of-hours referrals are also mirrored in-hours then the impact on secondary care is likely to be significant.3 Empathy and communication skills are important, but so is the ability to live with risk in general practice as is the ability, under pressure, to ‘clear the decks’.

We found the median age of GPs in Scotland to be between 45 and 50 years. They were mostly male and working fulltime, as are those aged between 50 and 60 years. This ‘wave’ of full-timers is shortly to crash on the shores of retirement, with those behind them increasingly part-time. While we agree that it is very important to have women in general practice, someone will have to look after the patients 10–20 years from now. On current recruitment and retention, given the likely female work pattern and without big imports from other countries our feminised workforce will not cope with future demands.

We need to accept that we will either need to employ more doctors in primary care in the future to make up this demographically-induced shortfall, find ways of allowing women to work longer hours and partake in the full range of general practice activities, or encourage more men to consider a career in primary care.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2007.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Howe A
    (2007) Why family medicine benefits from more women doctors. Br J Gen Pract 57(535):91–92.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Gravelle H,
    2. Hole A
    (2007) The work hours of general practitioners: survey of English GPs. Br J Gen Pract 57(535):96–100.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. ↵
    1. Rossdale M,
    2. Kemple T,
    3. Payne S,
    4. et al.
    (2007) An observational study of variation in general practitioners' out-of-hours emergency referrals. Br J Gen Pract 57(535):152–154.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. McKinstry B,
    2. Colthart I,
    3. Elliott K,
    4. Hunter C
    (2006) The feminization of the medical work force, implications for Scottish primary care: a survey of Scottish general practitioners. BMC Health Serv Res 6:56.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 57 (538)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 57, Issue 538
May 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Women in medicine
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Women in medicine
Brian McKinstry, Iain Colthart
British Journal of General Practice 2007; 57 (538): 409.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Women in medicine
Brian McKinstry, Iain Colthart
British Journal of General Practice 2007; 57 (538): 409.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Two-tiered medicine: the increasing disparity in medical care in the UK
  • MRCGP Recorded Consultation Assessment — the hidden fourth construct
  • Prostate-specific antigen testing and opportunistic prostate cancer screening — CAP intervention
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242