Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Advertisement
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Back Pages

Supermarket medicine?

Mike Fitzpatrick
British Journal of General Practice 2007; 57 (538): 423.
Mike Fitzpatrick
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The government's invitation to supermarket chains and retail pharmacies to open up GP surgeries has provoked a generally negative response to what many doctors regard as ‘backdoor privatisation’. Yet, although this sort of political stunt seems unlikely to offer a future for primary health care, it does have the merit of challenging the current framework of GP services within the NHS.

When I came into general practice in the early 1980s, the small-shopkeeper model was still dominant. In the inner city areas where I worked, the corner-shop surgery often appeared to be a bastion of poor standards of practice in poor quality premises. For the radical Medical Practitioners Union (MPU), of which I was a rather inactive member, the independent contractor status of the GP was an anachronism, a consequence of the medical profession's reactionary resistance to the concept of the NHS and a bulwark of the sort of petit-bourgeois prejudices paraded every week in Pulse. At the time, I sympathised with the MPU's campaign for primary care services provided by salaried GPs in purpose-built health centres.

One of the ironies of the last decade is that, Although the socialist aspirations of the MPU have been crushed in the process of the wider collapse of the left, its vision of salaried GPs, collectivised in primary healthcare teams, has been largely implemented. Although I feel little regret at the demise of the lock-up shop, back-parlour, single-handed GP, his replacement by a state functionary committed to performance targets, lifestyle management and social engineering projects raises serious concerns about the future of medical practice.

The ascendancy of bureaucratic state control over GPs has thrown a new light on some of the virtues of self-employment. For example, the emergence ‘bottom-up’ of flexible, functional, computer systems in general practice owes much to its small shopkeeper traditions (while, in hospitals, records are still being trundled around in wheelbarrows and, of course, being lost). By contrast, the imposition, ‘top-down’, of government schemes like ‘choose and book’ has been another costly IT fiasco. While hospital consultants — and salaried GPs — are subjected to all sorts of managerial constraints, independent contractor GPs continue to enjoy substantial professional autonomy: despite increasing interference, we can still practice as we wish and say what we like.

Can Tesco or Boots offer a way forward for primary health care? I would not dismiss the possibility out of hand. They could certainly provide funds for capital projects on a scale that seems unlikely to be forthcoming from the public sector. The straightforward language of private enterprise would be a welcome relief from the cynical rhetoric of a health service administered by New Labour apparatchiks. Yet the notion that the supermarket can provide a ready-made solution to the exhaustion of the corner shop model of NHS primary care reflects the Blair government's simplistic approach to ‘modernisation’.

As numerous commentators have observed, health care is not a commodity that can be bought and sold like baked beans or socks. Choice among different brands is problematic enough for those shopping for consumer goods and services. When the consumer is ill and becomes a patient, what matters most is the relationship of trust that can enable them to negotiate the imbalance of knowledge and expertise in their encounter with a doctor. Out-of-town shopping malls will not provide easy access to healthcare professionals for the infirm or the elderly. The atomised interaction of the checkout counter will not be a satisfactory substitute for a continuing personal relationship of care, at least for those customers who need more than occasional travel vaccinations or hay fever remedies. There is some doubt whether many supermarket customers really want ‘24–7’ services; the attempt to provide health care in this way is destined to sacrifice quality and continuity to political expediency.

The history of primary care suggests that neither the market nor the state can guarantee the professional autonomy of the doctor that is crucial to the doctor–patient relationship. The spectre of supermarket general practice confirms only that both the small shopkeeper and the state socialist models of primary health care are moribund. The challenge is to find ways of funding and providing primary health care that ensure adequate resources while respecting the distinct, but complementary, interests of doctors and patients.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2007.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 57 (538)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 57, Issue 538
May 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Supermarket medicine?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Supermarket medicine?
Mike Fitzpatrick
British Journal of General Practice 2007; 57 (538): 423.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Supermarket medicine?
Mike Fitzpatrick
British Journal of General Practice 2007; 57 (538): 423.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • How to protect general practice from child protection
  • Who Is My Patient?
  • Working with vulnerable families in deprived areas
Show more The Back Pages

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242