Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

The saviour of the NHS — my cat

Ozan Adali
British Journal of General Practice 2007; 57 (541): 668.
Ozan Adali
Watling Medical Centre, 108 Watling Avenue, Burnt Oak, HA8 0NR. E-mail:
Roles: GP
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: ozanadali@hotmail.com
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Gordon Brown should hold urgent talks with my fat 3-year-old cat Mustafa. She (I am aware her name is a boy's one) can describe without question, the faults of the current out-of-hours (OOH) service and make suggestions for a model that works.

A few weeks ago Mustafa decided to hurt her front paw. This is her diary — Day 1: Mustafa has done something to her front paw. She won't tell me what, but she isn't weight bearing. A definite bump over her MCP joint prompts a call for help.

One quick phone call to our local vet (they are part of a large chain and easily identifiable with a branch in most high streets), and we are put through to their on-call base in a nearby town. We rush over to the OOH vet base. Happy to be seen quickly, but mid-week night shifts at base are quiet anyway. Thankfully it isn't Saturday!

See a foreign vet who speaks limited English and whose response to my wife's tearful plea for them not to keep Mustafa in overnight was a blunt: ‘What else would you like me to do?’. Nice communication skills mate. X-rays done that night show no fracture and no dislocation. She is patched up and discharged the next day after ‘other vets look at the X-ray’. Follow-up is planned for 3 days later at another base.

Day 4: This laughable follow-up consultation involves prodding at Mustafa's painful paw and planning follow-up again. Fobbing off does not count as continuity of care.

Day 7: She is seen by a different vet in our local surgery (finally) and deemed to be fine. No limp and the dressing removed. I can see the bony prominence on her paw. Mustafa wants to get out of there, so no arguments. As soon as we are home, she cannot weight bear again.

Day 8: An angry parent (me) calls the vet. I demand that they bring over the X-rays and for her to be seen again. We see the same vet as yesterday. For the first time ever, some continuity of care. Take a bow. I make him feel the bony MCP prominence and show him the dislocation in the X-ray (I did learn something in A&E). He has now arranged for her to have her operation in the morning.

Weeks 2–3: Regular follow-ups with our local vet. Mustafa continues to improve all the time. Harmony returns as vet–cat relationship grows strong.

Mustafa would tel Mr Brown that she is hungry. She would also go on to tel him that OOH services provided by larger, private companies can provide doctors of poorer quality (and cheaper salaries) than is acceptable for patients. In running efficiently with profit, they cut doctor work to a minimum. Nurses are cheaper. They send around memos to staff to promote ‘lean-working’ (cheap) management babble. Patients travel further to be seen by a random, possibly recently imported, doctor. That doctor may have travelled an impressive distance just to ‘cash in’ that night. There is no continuity of care or any relationship with the patient. Loyalty is the pay cheque that comes every month. Add dissatisfied and stressed doctors to this pile and you get poor patient satisfaction and, sadly, tragic mistakes.

She would then tell Mr Brown his name is not nearly as funny as her own. She would then quote the model of OOH care in the little Hertfordshire city where she lives. The OOH service is staffed by an army of local GPs. They don't easily employ outside GPs. Having sorted out quality control, they take ownership and responsibility for each other's patients. This is the motivation that keeps the service staffed. Communication and continuity of care are maintained. This service is more expensive. There is no nurse triage and there can even be ‘quiet shifts’. There are increasingly few areas where an OOH service is supported so well locally. Patients here do not know how lucky they are.

PCTs need to be able to afford OOH services that deliver for their patients and not for the local funding deficits. Contracts are up for renewal and our local gold standard service is moving with the times to stay alive. Let's hope quality is not lost at the expense of quantity.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2007.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 57 (541)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 57, Issue 541
August 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
The saviour of the NHS — my cat
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
The saviour of the NHS — my cat
Ozan Adali
British Journal of General Practice 2007; 57 (541): 668.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
The saviour of the NHS — my cat
Ozan Adali
British Journal of General Practice 2007; 57 (541): 668.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Two-tiered medicine: the increasing disparity in medical care in the UK
  • MRCGP Recorded Consultation Assessment — the hidden fourth construct
  • Prostate-specific antigen testing and opportunistic prostate cancer screening — CAP intervention
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242