Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Advertisement
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Back Pages

Lessons from the intravenous room in Hangzhou

Sally A Hull
British Journal of General Practice 2007; 57 (542): 754.
Sally A Hull
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

In 2006 I went with a delegation from Queen Mary and City Universities to a community health conference in Hangzhou, the university town of Zhejiang Province on the east coast of China. There is a great interest in developing primary health services in this vast continent of 1.3 billion people, and we took a team which included primary care researchers, a clinical effectiveness group, and educationalists.

When China began to open up in 1986 there was a rapid growth in hospital provision. In urban areas there is an oversupply of technology-rich hospitals, with high prices and competitive policies. Although official national policy since 1997 has been to develop community health centres this has been constantly undermined by a failure to regulate new entrants to the hospital market, and by the low status and education of community health staff. At present only about 4000 primary care doctors have postgraduate training of any sort, and 6% of clinical staff have no formal training at all. In 1999 a 3-year family medicine training programme started in Beijing, but the course closed in 2004 due to lack of applicants. The few successful graduates became specialists due to lack of jobs in general practice. (Figure 1).

Figure 1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Figure 1

The mismatch between health needs and the supply of health service facilities in urban China.

Zhejiang Province is one of the most affluent areas in China, with 48 million people. It is a progressive province where there is a determined attempt to implement the new national policy of promoting primary care.1 Community services are arranged in a hub and spoke pattern, the hub often being a secondary hospital requisitioned as a community facility with smaller clinics in the surrounding neighbourhood.

On visiting the well-equipped demonstration project in Hangzhou the first thing we saw was the price list. Funding remains an area of policy confusion. Only 20% of community health services are even included in health insurance schemes, and only one in 10 get their full budget allocation from the provincial government. So, although the total health spend for China in 2004 was 5.5% of GDP, some 60% of this was borne by patients.2 The combination of using high technology hospitals and high co-payments means that among hospitalised patients nearly half seek discharge because of their inability to pay, with many citing healthcare costs as a major cause of debt and poverty.

Watching consultations illustrated a number of other obstructions to service development. There is no registered list, so patients move between hospital, pharmacy, and primary care providers with no constraint. This undermines the emerging attempts to develop computerised records, audit, and recall for chronic disease.3 Clinicians consult in cubicles two to a room, with low glass screens to separate stations (page 755). Privacy is simply not considered a priority. In contrast we were shown vigorous programmes of neighbourhood health education and kerbside case finding for hypertension.

My major epiphany came when we visited a small community clinic. Here we were shown a room with a row of plastic chairs placed beneath hooks in the ceiling (page 755). Difficult to understand its purpose, the doctor eventually explained that most people want an IV infusion of antibiotics if they have a pharyngitis or other infection. She agreed that there was little evidence to support this, but pointed out wryly that if her clinic didn't do this, patients would go to the nearest hospital for this treatment.

The difficulties in developing high-quality primary care services in a system without a strong tradition of family medicine, and without firm control of the market for high-cost drugs and technology seem immense. The NHS still provides a model for this — at present. We should support China on its challenging journey to transform health services; and we should reflect on all we have to lose if market forces become too dominant in our own patch.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2007.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Nieman L,
    2. Kvale J,
    3. Xijuan F,
    4. et al.
    (2001) Building a family practice model of health in the Peoples Republic of China. Fam Med 22(9):691–701.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    Proceedings of the UK Community Health Services Conference (April 2006, Hangzhou, China).
  3. ↵
    1. Wang L,
    2. Kong L,
    3. Wu F,
    4. et al.
    (2005) Preventing chronic disease in China. Lancet 366(9499):1821–1824.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 57 (542)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 57, Issue 542
September 2007
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Download PowerPoint
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Lessons from the intravenous room in Hangzhou
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Lessons from the intravenous room in Hangzhou
Sally A Hull
British Journal of General Practice 2007; 57 (542): 754.

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Lessons from the intravenous room in Hangzhou
Sally A Hull
British Journal of General Practice 2007; 57 (542): 754.
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

The Back Pages

  • Who Is My Patient?
  • Working with vulnerable families in deprived areas
  • What is the collective noun for a group of patients?
Show more The Back Pages

Essay

  • ‘Heartsink’ patients in general practice: a defining paper, its impact, and psychodynamic potential
  • Second thoughts about the NHS reforms
  • Good enough care?
Show more Essay

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242