Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Advertisement
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Back Pages

Outdoor psychiatry

Mike Fitzpatrick
British Journal of General Practice 2008; 58 (548): 216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp08X279616
Mike Fitzpatrick
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

In recent years it has become fashionable to decry the policy, initiated in the 1960s and accelerating in the 1980s, of transferring people with long-term mental illness from institutions into various forms of care in the community. Now widely scorned as a policy driven by a convergence between radical anti-psychiatry and reactionary cost-cutting, community care has been blamed for pushing disturbed individuals onto the streets, where, in a number of highly publicised cases, they have killed themselves or other people.

‘Care in the community has failed’ the then health minister Frank Dobson told parliament in 1998, in an opportunist invocation of a popular prejudice. I recall thinking that this was a mean-spirited jibe at all those who, over the preceding decades, had striven to release the mentally ill from institutional confinement. Anybody who ever visited the back wards of the old asylums knows that, whatever the inadequacies of care in the community, it marked a historic advance in the treatment of people with serious mental illness. The glib global condemnation of community care fails to recognise the dramatic improvements in mental health services in recent years, and the range of imaginative initiatives that now exists.

As a GP in Hackney over the past two decades, I have witnessed a transformation in local mental health services. It is therefore a particular pleasure to find that two of Hackney's leading psychiatrists — Mark Salter and Trevor Turner — have produced A Practical Guide to Outdoor Psychiatry, which is informed by the experience of providing community mental health care in one of the country's most diverse and challenging neighbourhoods.1 ‘Keeping patients well’ they write, ‘requires a mix of money and therapeutic skills, a knowledge of social, welfare, cultural and housing arrangements, an awareness of basic medical and medication aspects, and a hard core of commonsense.’ Their book covers all these areas and more, with wit and passion, with a sense of history and a shrewd awareness of the role of politics and the media.

The prejudice that community care is a failure has been nurtured by one public ‘serious incident’ inquiry after another. As the authors acerbically put it, ‘assaults with swords always get the headlines’. The result is the culture of ‘risk management’ and ‘risk assessment’, which the authors regard as ‘the single most pernicious change in the delivery of mental health care in the last 20 years’. They blame ‘the lawyers and the hindsight junkies creaming a living from the random misfortunes that happen to mentally ill people in a complex individualistic and unrealistic society.’

The authors warn that when risk becomes the basic criterion of services, mental health workers ‘essentially become psychological dustcart drivers’. Major resources will be spent on a small number of people deemed (not necessarily accurately) to be a threat, while the vast majority of people who need help, but are not a danger, get overlooked. Furthermore, the risk agenda encourages a resort to coercive legislation (notably in the proposal to introduce preventive detention for those with ‘dangerously severe personality disorder’) and the return to diverse forms of institutionalisation.

Salter and Turner acknowledge that their handbook is written for somebody who does not yet exist — a professional community mental health worker. Still, it makes a valuable contribution by defining the skills, values, and training required by such a worker. I hope the book encourages the emergence of a generic mental health worker, who could give greater coherence to the work of struggling locality mental health teams.

Meanwhile, as GPs will continue to carry out a share of the tasks of community mental health care, Outdoor Psychiatry will be a useful guide, and the optimistic spirit expressed in its final sentence is an inspiration: ‘Our business is unique and wonderful and the journey never ends.’

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2008.

REFERENCE

  1. ↵
    1. Salter M,
    2. Turner T
    (2007) Community mental health care: a practical guide to outdoor psychiatry (Churchill Livingstone, London).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 58 (548)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 58, Issue 548
March 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Outdoor psychiatry
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Outdoor psychiatry
Mike Fitzpatrick
British Journal of General Practice 2008; 58 (548): 216. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp08X279616

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Outdoor psychiatry
Mike Fitzpatrick
British Journal of General Practice 2008; 58 (548): 216. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp08X279616
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCE
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • The ethics of listening and responding to patients' narratives: implications for practice
  • How big is your society?
  • Evidence-based medicine and Web 2.0: friend or foe?
Show more The Back Pages

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242