Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Authors' response

Neil Munro and Michael Feher
British Journal of General Practice 2008; 58 (555): 729-730. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp08X342417
Neil Munro
Roles: Capelfield Surgery
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Michael Feher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

We are surprised to see that the letter by Dr Curtis is published as a critique of our editorial on ‘Current, new and emerging therapies for managing hyperglycaemia of type 2 diabetes’.1 He has used the pages of the BJGP to promulgate a personal view against the tide of epidemiological and clinical trial evidence that glucose lowering has been shown to reduce microvascular events in type 2 diabetes. On the basis of the extensive evidence, consensus guidelines from national and international diabetes organisations (for example International Diabetes Foundation, American Diabetes Association, Diabetes UK, as well as NICE) have recommended the use of HbA1c as a therapeutic target — which he omitted to address. The newer trials of ADVANCE and ACCORD were trials of ‘how low should one go’ in terms glycaemic targets as measured by HbA1c. It is of interest that Dr Curtis fails to accept the results of the ADVANCE study where there were published treatment benefits on renal events.

The aim of our editorial was to summarise the differing drug classes available for the management of the hyperglycaemia and not to review major randomised outcome trials. There is now a wider drug choice which might allow tailoring of therapy to individuals – many of whom are overweight or poor responders to current therapies. The progressive nature of type 2 diabetes, ignored by Dr Curtis, is a key therapeutic factor resulting in a need for combination of therapies and thus a potential role for newer therapies. Due to these reasons, plus the limited glucose lowering effects of all drug classes, therapeutic agents with different modes of action to enhance glucose lowering are often required. Current clinical practice often includes considering the use of alternative drug classes that do not affect weight, since this is one of the important adverse effects of subcutaneous insulins, as well as oral insulin secretagogues and thiazolidinediones.

We owe it to our patients to be aware of therapeutic advances and place them in the context of present therapies in order to improve glycaemia and reduce the burden of diabetes-related complications.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2008.

REFERENCE

  1. ↵
    1. Curtis S
    (2008) Managing hyperglycaemia. Br J Gen Pract 58(554):728.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 58 (555)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 58, Issue 555
October 2008
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Authors' response
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Authors' response
Neil Munro, Michael Feher
British Journal of General Practice 2008; 58 (555): 729-730. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp08X342417

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Authors' response
Neil Munro, Michael Feher
British Journal of General Practice 2008; 58 (555): 729-730. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp08X342417
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCE
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • An earlier diagnosis of heart failure
  • Group A strep: has point-of-care testing for primary care finally come of age?
  • Author response
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242