Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Back Pages

MUM'S CHANCES

Andrew Papanikitas
British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (560): 213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X420130
Andrew Papanikitas
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Jean* stared past us into the hereafter, barely moving except to gasp. Pale and emaciated, her breathing noisy, shallow, and fast, she clung to life by a thinning thread. The receiving casualty officer in A&E had given the 90 year old an intravenous line, started antibiotics, and referred to the on-call medics. The chest X-ray confirmed pneumonia and he had sent appropriate initial blood tests. He had also taken the step of filling out a ‘Do not attempt resuscitation form’, on the basis of ‘unlikely to succeed’, and moved her from the resuscitation room to an emergency department cubicle.

Her son and daughter-in-law arrived as I attended. She lived in a nursing home, was normally bed-bound and completely dependent as well as ‘severely’ demented — no longer able to communicate beyond ‘Yes’, ‘No’, and ‘Dada’. Two weeks ago she had become agitated and was treated with oral antibiotics for pneumonia. She had rallied such that her son had felt able to go on holiday, but over the preceding 48 hours she deteriorated. ‘We came back to an answer-phone message telling us that mum was in hospital.’

Jean's son tearfully agreed that to put her through the rigors of cardiopulmonary resuscitation would be cruel: her grandson had lingered in intensive care following a road accident before succumbing to his injuries. ‘Don't let me go like that’, she had told her son. We agreed that ‘what would work’ (the advice of the doctors) and what ‘Jean would want’ (the advice of Jean's family) allowed a trial of antibiotics until the drip failed. She had been a struggle to cannulate, and we agreed to hold off any further invasion of her body, besides subcutaneous fluids and medication for respiratory distress or pain. ‘She's more peaceful than she has been in weeks,’ confessed her son, but agreed that oxygen and fluids would ‘make her more comfortable’. Son and daughter-in-law did not have any further questions, but wanted to be called if Jean worsened overnight. The son hesitated, but the daughter-in-law was in no doubt.

‘What are Mum's chances?’ asked the son.

‘Your mother is very poorly, and she may not respond to the antibiotics …’

He blinked tears and held her un-cannulated hand in both his hands, ‘Does she have any chance?’.

‘She may yet rally … like she did before.’

The encounter was documented, and Jean was ‘handed over’ to the night medical team. My seniors on call were of the opinion that if she went home, she should not be readmitted to A&E.

The next day as I attended one of my patients on the acute admissions ward, I heard singing. No words, just, ‘Dadada … DAAAHHDadada …’ tunefully shouted. In a corner of one of the bays, Jean sat up in bed. She looked happy, though the other two patients in the bay did not. She clutched both bed rails and sang at anything that moved. Agitation did not seem an appropriate word. She had rallied. She was far from peaceful, but she was eating and drinking, and she looked happy.

Had we given up on her too soon, and would she have rallied without 4.5 grams of tazocin dripped into her veins every few hours? Our decisions had not been difficult. We had gone with the flow of events and agreed to do no more than had been done. We made it easy for her relatives to tell us what she might want without giving them the decision as to whether she lived or died. There was a satisfaction that her life had been preserved. She seemed to have some degree of happiness, and she and her family were not ready to be parted.

I came across Jean a fortnight later. On one of the acute wards on a Friday afternoon, I heard a familiar voice shouting. The tunefulness had gone. The shouting sounded anxious and desperate. Without going into the bay, I asked a nurse:

‘Is that …’

‘Mrs Smith yes.’

‘Didn't she go to her nursing home?’

‘Yes. But she was back within 48 hours, and the medical team had said that she was for TLC and that it wouldn't be appropriate to send her back. She's not having any antibiotics this time. She's just sitting here waiting to die, bless her.’

Footnotes

  • ↵* Jean Smith is a fictional name based on many people's mothers

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2009.
View Abstract
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 59 (560)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 59, Issue 560
March 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
MUM'S CHANCES
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
MUM'S CHANCES
Andrew Papanikitas
British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (560): 213. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp09X420130

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
MUM'S CHANCES
Andrew Papanikitas
British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (560): 213. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp09X420130
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Footnotes
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

The Back Pages

  • Who Is My Patient?
  • Working with vulnerable families in deprived areas
  • What is the collective noun for a group of patients?
Show more The Back Pages

Viewpoint

  • The NHS: have the rivets popped?
  • Bring Hippocrates to the people and save the NHS
  • Getting the swagger back into general practice
Show more Viewpoint

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242