Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Back Pages

How to be happy in general practice: a personal view

Geoffrey N Marsh
British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (561): 295. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X420455
Geoffrey N Marsh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Thirty-four years in the same room in my practice at the end of the High Street; I closed the surgery door for the last time: I cried on the way home. Now after 15 years of wonderful retirement I reflect on what were the elements of my job that made me so happy through my working life.

First and foremost I had a ‘personal’ list in a group practice: three or four thousand diverse people who across the years brought to me a pot-pourri of problems from the trivial to the tragic. I observed every conceivable emotion, every type of human behaviour and a comprehensive catalogue of clinical illness. Not surprising then, that after 34 years of responding to these people they became almost friends. (Well, 300 people turned up for my ‘leaving party’ with an embarrassment of gifts!). With a large list the clinical volume of the commoner conditions was considerable, hence expertise was maintained, and even rarer conditions cropped up fairly frequently (I had four patients with Addison's Disease!). With careful organisation of appointment systems, and referral back from colleagues, a personal list did not necessitate burdensome availability. I saw all my patients' major problems and about 80% of their minor ones. Hence I countered the frequently expressed criticism that people ‘never see the same person’ and that there is poor continuity of care. And being one of a group of five doctors provided the medical camaraderie (and conflict!) to prevent medical isolation.

I worked from well-equipped self-owned premises and we had a major extension or refurbishment about every 10 years. We were quite proud of the old place!

I was a member of a multidisciplinary team. Many of us met daily, others less frequently, but usually at known times. Nurses, midwives, health visitors, social workers, counsellors, dieticians, and physiotherapists supplemented my clinical care and attended to many of the psychosocial problems presenting as ‘disease’. Nurses in particular expanded their role and their numbers increased across the years. Preventative care was largely done by them. For chronic clinical illness they worked to practice-ordained protocols.

‘Homely comforts’ were important for all team members. We employed a ‘tea lady’ to serve quality tea and coffee twice daily in the team common room and all members were happy to attend!

We delegated administration, paper and computer work, recording and summarising, data collection and statistics to a large lay staff, employable as a result of the income generated by the large lists. It was gratifying to see how conscientiously the staff undertook these tasks – what could be tedious for doctors proved challenging and interesting to them. From the data and statistics flowed many papers and several books. This gave the whole team a ‘buzz’.

Quality clinical care was the bedrock of our practice. Teaching and learning from trainees was helpful in this. We ordained a half-day per week for ‘study’, a monthly team clinical meeting, and attended a week-long ‘refresher course’ once a year. Six-month sabbaticals were undertaken by some of us including visiting professorships to Canada and the US and two practice exchanges with Canadian colleagues. Ennui and ‘burn-out’ was avoided.

Overall I tried to diagnose and treat patients without extensive investigations and referral to hospital. I examined patients repeatedly. I minimised medication and had low prescribing costs. Latterly, individual doctors developed ‘special interests’ – diabetes, skin, asthma, minor surgery, family planning – all collaborating with nurses. Cross referral within the practice began and we reckoned to reduce hospital referrals further – the expensive part of the NHS.

As in virtually every practice ‘minor illness’ was the volume problem. However, its presentation provided an opportunity for a quick review of ‘preventative care’ procedures that may not have been done. Arrangements for them could be instituted, we did not aggrandise it and self-care was encouraged. Truly minor illness received a minor response! Specially trained nurses shared it as there was enough to go around.

Home visiting, once the ‘jewel in the crown’ of British general practice, took up far too much time. I saw and encouraged its demise in the 70s and 80s and it was largely replaced by telephone consultations. But selectively it continued to be one of the most rewarding aspects of the job and because of it, quite serious illness could be cared for at home. In addition, doctors and nurses visited the housebound disabled and chronic sick. We generally visited the newborn and occasionally patients discharged from hospital after major illness or drastic surgery. Of major importance were visits to the dying where we tried to provide quality care at home for (often) long cared for patients. Such events were not numerous but the visits bonded us to the caring families and were cherished and remembered by them. Most people want to die at home and the GP and his team are essential in facilitating this.

But most of these elements of the job are still attainable and I would recommend them to GPs who seek a happy working life. Perhaps those who are currently seeking to restructure future general practice might also bear them in mind.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2009.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 59 (561)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 59, Issue 561
April 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How to be happy in general practice: a personal view
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
How to be happy in general practice: a personal view
Geoffrey N Marsh
British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (561): 295. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp09X420455

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
How to be happy in general practice: a personal view
Geoffrey N Marsh
British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (561): 295. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp09X420455
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

The Back Pages

  • The ethics of listening and responding to patients' narratives: implications for practice
  • How big is your society?
  • Evidence-based medicine and Web 2.0: friend or foe?
Show more The Back Pages

Essay

  • Second thoughts about the NHS reforms
  • Good enough care?
  • Social prescribing in very deprived areas
Show more Essay

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242