Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions

Table of Contents

July 2009; Volume 59,Issue 564

Original Paper - Full-length version

  • You have access
    The journey from self-care to GP care: a qualitative interview study of women presenting with symptoms of urinary tract infection
    Geraldine M Leydon, Sheila Turner, Helen Smith, Paul Little and on behalf of the UTIS team
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): e219-e225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453459
  • You have access
    Exploring the impact of patient views on ‘appropriate’ use of services and help seeking: a mixed method study
    Joy Adamson, Yoav Ben-Shlomo, Nish Chaturvedi and Jenny Donovan
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): e226-e233. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453530

Systematic Reviews

  • Original Paper - Full-length version

    • You have access
      Follow-up of cancer in primary care versus secondary care: systematic review
      Ruth A Lewis, Richard D Neal, Nefyn H Williams, Barbara France, Maggie Hendry, Daphne Russell, Dyfrig A Hughes, Ian Russell, Nicholas SA Stuart, David Weller and Clare Wilkinson
      British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): e234-e247. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453567
    • You have access
      Patients' and healthcare professionals' views of cancer follow-up: systematic review
      Ruth A Lewis, Richard D Neal, Maggie Hendry, Barbara France, Nefyn H Williams, Daphne Russell, Dyfrig A Hughes, Ian Russell, Nicholas SA Stuart, David Weller and Clare Wilkinson
      British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): e248-e259. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453576

July Focus

  • You have access
    July Focus
    David Jewell
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453477

Editorials

  • You have access
    Revalidation: a professional imperative
    Martin Marshall
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 476-477. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453486
  • You have access
    Before the consultation: why people do (or do not) go to the doctor
    Annette Braunack-Mayer and Jodie C Avery
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 478-479. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453495
  • You have access
    Dying and living with learning disability: will health checks for adults improve their quality of life?
    Graham Martin and Peter Lindsay
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 480-481. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453503
  • You have access
    What is the value of routine follow-up after diagnosis and treatment of cancer?
    Peter W Rose and Eila Watson
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 482-483. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453512

Original Papers

  • You have access
    Verifying appraisal evidence using feedback from trained peers: views and experiences of Scottish GP appraisers
    Paul Bowie, Niall Cameron, Ian Staples, Rhona McMillan, John McKay and Murray Lough
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 484-489. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453521
  • You have access
    People with learning disabilities who have cancer: an ethnographic study
    Irene Tuffrey-Wijne, Jane Bernal, Jane Hubert, Gary Butler and Sheila Hollins
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 503-509. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453413
  • You have access
    Identification of UK sickness certification rates, standardised for age and sex
    Gwenllian Wynne-Jones, Christian D Mallen, Sara Mottram, Chris J Main and Kate M Dunn
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 510-516. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453431
  • You have access
    Commentary: From sickness to fitness: modernising medical certification
    Steven E Bradshaw
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 515. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453549

Discussion Papers

  • You have access
    Ethics of complementary medicine: practical issues
    Edzard Ernst
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 517-519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453404
  • You have access
    Commentary: Conventional medicine is less than perfect
    Brian S Buckley
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 519. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453558
  • You have access
    Type 2 diabetes, thiazolidinediones, and cardiovascular risk
    Clare Taylor and FD Richard Hobbs
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 520-524. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453440

Letters

  • You have access
    CAM — trick or treatment?
    Edin Lakasing and Sonia Grover
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 541. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453585
  • You have access
    Author's response
    Edzard Ernst
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 541-542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453594
  • You have access
    Waste in the NHS
    Zoe Kenyon
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453602
  • You have access
    Depression in younger people
    James Finlayson
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 542. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453611

The Back Pages

  • You have access
    ‘Just a furious, helpless roar’
    Mike Fitzpatrick
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453657
  • You have access
    Doom?
    Saul Miller
    British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 554. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453710
  • Viewpoint

    • You have access
      No Place for Children
      John Launer
      British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 543. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453620
    • You have access
      Reflections in a cracked mirror
      Chris Heath
      British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453684
  • Essay

    • You have access
      The consultation and physical examination
      Alexandra L Connan
      British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 544-545. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453639
    • You have access
      Patient care — crunch time
      David G Connell
      British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 546-547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453648
    • You have access
      Insecurity and risk in the consultation
      Jeff Clark
      British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 548-549. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453666
    • You have access
      Isolation and insight: practical pillars of revalidation?
      Stephen J Cox and John D Holden
      British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 550-551. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453675
  • Digest

    • You have access
      Nice one Arthur
      Roger Jones
      British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453693
  • Serial

    • You have access
      Facing unpalatable truths: 2
      Jane Roberts
      British Journal of General Practice 2009; 59 (564): 553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp09X453701
Back to top
PreviousNext

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 59 (564)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 59, Issue 564
July 2009
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Alert me to new issues
  • eLetters
  • Most Cited
  • Most Read
Loading
Judgement of data saturation: reply
Letter from the Editor
Judgment of data saturation
General practice - the integrating discipline
MMR - what about rubella and congenital rubella syndrome
View all eLetters

Jump to

  • Original Paper - Full-length version
  • Systematic Reviews
    • Original Paper - Full-length version
  • July Focus
  • Editorials
  • Original Papers
  • Discussion Papers
  • Letters
  • The Back Pages
    • Viewpoint
    • Essay
    • Digest
    • Serial
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

Tweets by @BJGPjournal

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242