Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
February Focus

February Focus

Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2010; 60 (571): 74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp10X482275
Roger Jones
Roles: Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Research that matters is inspired, more often than not, by questions arising during contact with patients in routine clinical practice. The answers to these questions often have a meaningful impact on patient care, practice or policy. This issue of the Journal presents the results of a number of studies which address uncertainties that will resonate with many clinicians

The first of these concerns frequent attenders in general practice — the ‘fat folder’ patients who, interestingly, have become less visible in the era of electronic health records. Luciano and colleagues from Catalonia, Spain (page 95) have modelled a series of definitions of frequent attenders and in doing so, as well as raising a range of new questions, have identified factors associated with frequent attendance. These include, unsurprisingly, receipt of sickness certification and mental health problems but also a number of characteristics of the GPs themselves, patients who have moved to Spain from other countries, and physical problems including chronic musculoskeletal and respiratory conditions.

Knee pain often presents difficulties in diagnosis and management, and there is evidence that examination of the knee joint is not always performed as well as it might be. In a 1-year follow-up of patients with acute knee pain in Rotterdam, Wagemakers and colleagues (page 106) found that there was little difference in outcome between patients with and without meniscal tears and ligament damage, raising questions about other predictors of outcome and criteria for investigation and referral. Large scale extraction of routinely collected data from electronic patient health records would be a useful way to pursue these interesting findings.

The Primary Care E-Health group at University College London (page 88) present their findings from interviews with GPs about patients bringing them information obtained from the internet. This can clearly be a source of anxiety and irritation to some of us, yet it seems that, at least in north London, GPs are developing sophisticated strategies to deal with the concerns elicited by being shown material of which they may be both unaware and distrustful. This is a topic that won't go away and is a fertile area for further research.

Underlying all these, and other challenges we face in consultations with patients are our consultation (or communication) skills, and non-verbal communication is the topic of a study from Bialystok, Poland (page 83). Most, but not all, patients are sensitive to their doctor's non-verbal style, with tone of voice, eye contact, and facial expression being the features attracting most attention. It would be fascinating to see the extent to which these findings are consistent across cultures.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2010.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 60 (571)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 60, Issue 571
February 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
February Focus
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
February Focus
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2010; 60 (571): 74. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X482275

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
February Focus
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2010; 60 (571): 74. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X482275
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • February Focus
  • February Focus
Show more February Focus

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242