Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Editorials

Strong medicine: research, education, and patient care in general practice

Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2010; 60 (571): 75-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp10X482284
Roger Jones
Department of General Practice and Primary Care, King's College London
Roles: BJGP Editor
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

The fact that strong general practice is an essential component of a high quality and cost-effective healthcare system is a message that has never been fully absorbed by successive ministries of health in the UK. (The over-worked and almost meaningless term ‘primary care led’ seems to have been used in the mistaken belief that it just meant cheap.) Ironically, it is a message that has been stated clearly in the US, where Barbara Starfield, the distinguished health services researcher at Johns Hopkins, has published high quality research to make the point1,2 and where Don Berwick, President of the Institute for Healthcare Improvement, wrote in his essay celebrating 60 years of the NHS that, ‘General practice is the jewel in the crown of the NHS. Save it. Build it’.3 We have done neither but instead, with the encouragement of the government, have half-dismantled it and sleep-walked into a time of peril for general practice and for patient care.4 Almost all of the core characteristics of general practice identified by Starfield are in danger of becoming eroded by successive and often poorly-informed lurches in health policy.

General practice in the UK was never perfect — there was never an unalloyed golden age — but primary care problems do not require tertiary care solutions. Instead, they require the engagement of primary care clinicians, educators, and researchers working together to protect and develop the structures needed to deliver high quality patient care and to support high professional standards. Two recent publications provide valuable food for thought.

The first of these is Tomorrow's Doctors,5 the most recent iteration of the General Medical Council's (GMC's) guide to the attributes required of medical practitioners and the educational means needed to instill them. The new edition considers the role of the doctor as a scholar and scientist, as a practitioner and as a professional. It places a strong emphasis on probity and professionalism, on accurate diagnosis in conditions of uncertainty, on communication and leadership, and on patient safety.

The importance of general practice and the community as undergraduate educational settings has long been emphasised by the GMC, and general practice has often led the way in the quality of student experience provided in medical schools.6 In some areas adjacent to medical schools, up to half of all practices are involved in undergraduate teaching, and this work is at present adequately supported through educational funding streams for hospitals and general practices. Contact with general practice throughout the curriculum is becoming the norm and, besides its educational value, provides an important opportunity for undergraduates to experience general practice and to think about it as a career option. Whatever happens to educational funding and the commissioner-provider relationship in the future, the involvement of NHS GPs in teaching the next generation of doctors will remain essential, not least if we are to eventually see off the unhelpful tribalism that still develops among GPs and hospital doctors shortly after qualification. There must be respectful collaboration across today's shifting primary-secondary care interface.

The second recent document to emphasis a key aspect of general practice is a report published by The Academy of Medical Sciences entitled Research in General Practice: Bringing Innovation into Patient Care,7 which reports on a seminar where the contribution of primary care research to patient care was described, and the future needs of general practice research discussed. Widely regarded as world-leading, general practice research in the UK has made a difference to how we look after patients in many ways. It has helped to clarify the distribution of illness in the population and identified the fears and expectations patients bring to the consultation when they decide to see the doctor. It is increasingly providing valuable information to support rapid and accurate diagnosis and has provided an understanding of the importance of negotiating with patients about management plans and prescriptions. Many of the drugs used to treat common complaints have undergone clinical trials in general practice, and the principles of chronic disease management have been developed in research on disorders such as diabetes and asthma. Our role in health promotion and illness prevention has been clarified by community-based research. The measurement of quality (and the definition of many of the Quality and Outcomes Framework criteria) has been guided by GP researchers. This Journal has been instrumental in disseminating much of the best of general practice research from the UK and internationally over the last 40 years, including much of the work referred to in the Academy's report.

A disproportionately small number of GPs hold academic posts in university departments when their numbers are compared with those in many other specialties; and academic training structures for interested graduates remain inadequate and need more investment. However, financial support provided to primary care research networks by the National Institute for Health Research, along with project and programme funding, offers practices an exciting opportunity to contribute to these endeavours. The development of academic health sciences centres in some medical schools provides new ways of forging closer linkage between service and academic general practice.

When the President of the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) wrote that ‘Only general practice can save the NHS’,8 I don't think she was over-stating the case. If we stand aside and allow general practice to be further disabled by clumsy reorganisation and desperate financial manoeuvres, we will see the NHS become at once less effective and less affordable. Instead, we need to work together — service general practice, the RCGP, educators and researchers in university departments and the Deaneries, and others — to emphasise the importance of the jobs we are doing, to train the next generation of doctors to do them even better, and to provide the evidence on which to base what they do for their patients. The BJGP will continue to provide an expanding platform for the best general practice research from across the world, an opportunity for important developments in academic medicine to be widely communicated, and a focus for analysis to lead the debate about the future of health care and of the profession.

Notes

Provenance

Freely submitted; peer reviewed.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2010.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Starfield B
    (1994) Is primary care essential? Lancet 344(8930):1129–1133.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Starfield B,
    2. Shi L,
    3. Macinko J
    (2005) Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q 83(3):457–502.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. Berwick DM
    (2008) A transatlantic review of the NHS at 60. BMJ 337:a838.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Jones R
    (2007) Dismantling genral practice. Br J Gen Pract 57(544):860–861.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. General Medical Council Tomorrow's doctors
    (2009) (General Medical Council, London) http://www.gmc-uk.org/education/undergraduate/tomorrows_doctors_2009.asp (accessed 14 Jan 2010).
  6. ↵
    1. Rosenthal J,
    2. Stephenson A
    (2010) General practice: the future training environment: a report on undergraduate primary care education in London. Br J Gen Pract 60(571):144.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    1. The Academy of Medical Sciences
    (2009) Research in general practice: bringing innovation into patient care (The Academy of Medical Sciences, London) http://www.acmedsci.ac.uk/download.php?file=/images/publication/12569153801.pdf (accessed 14 Jan 2010).
  8. ↵
    1. Heath I
    (2007) Only general practice can save the NHS. BMJ 353:183, DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39286.704722.59.
    OpenUrl
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 60 (571)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 60, Issue 571
February 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Strong medicine: research, education, and patient care in general practice
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Strong medicine: research, education, and patient care in general practice
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2010; 60 (571): 75-76. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X482284

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Strong medicine: research, education, and patient care in general practice
Roger Jones
British Journal of General Practice 2010; 60 (571): 75-76. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X482284
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • Notes
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Continuity of GP care: using personal lists in general practice
  • Creating space for gut feelings in the diagnosis of cancer in primary care
  • GP workforce crisis: what can we do now?
Show more Editorials

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2022 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242