Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
    • RCGP e-Portfolio
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
Advertisement
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • RESOURCES
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • BJGP Life
    • eLetters
    • Librarian information
    • Alerts
    • Resilience
    • Video
    • Audio
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letters

Physical activity promotion

Richard Weiler
British Journal of General Practice 2010; 60 (578): 694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp10X515520
Richard Weiler
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust and Locum GP, Hertfordshire. E-mail:
Roles: Specialist Registrar in Sport & Exercise Medicine
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: rweiler@doctors.org.uk
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Davies and Garbutt wrote an important and commendable editorial on exercise prescription;1 however, there are some fundamental issues raised requiring clarification and further consideration.

First, when measured objectively, a staggering 95% of the adult population (UK and US) do not meet the minimum recommended levels of physical activity to confer basic health benefits.2,3

Second, most chronic diseases reflect the pandemic syndrome of physical inactivity. This predisposes the inactive majority to osteoporosis, muscle atrophy, low back pain, coronary artery disease, peripheral artery disease, stroke, hypertension, type 2 diabetes, obesity, dyslipidemia, metabolic syndrome, some cancers (for example, breast cancer), Alzheimer's disease, depression, pain, sleep problems, erectile dysfunction, death, and much more.4 Not only does physical activity prevent these unpleasant afflictions, but it should also be the very first treatment.5

Third, people seem to forget when reflecting on recommended guidelines for physical activity that they represent a minimum. Lets not forget there is a dose response to the level, duration, and intensity of physical activity (that is, the more you do and more vigorous, the greater the health benefits) and that something is better than nothing. Most guidelines state that about 30 minutes’ moderate to vigorous physical activity on at least 5 days a week or equivalent is the recommended minimum, including the recent BASES guidelines, which update and address some of this apparent confusion.6

Fourth, practitioner learning needs extend far beyond lacking basic knowledge about physical activity/inactivity. We are also not trained in lifestyle behaviour change techniques, that poses a significant barrier to exercise promotion success.7

A recent survey confirms that the current optional ‘Lets Get Moving’ physical activity care pathway is not being used. Only 660 (0.007%) of 9.5 million patients were found to have ever been coded for any of the GP Physical Activity Questionnaire read codes (March 2010 General Practice Research Gold Database).7

How sad if GPs will only wait until physical activity promotion is included in Quality and Outcomes Framework before implementing good medical practice and promoting physical activity to their patients at every appropriate opportunity.

Physical activity is a natural pill and both a cure and prevention for many ills. Given the way that modern medicine is practised and influenced, perhaps if we thought of physical inactivity as a disease in its own right and physical activity as a medication in the same way as prescribed drugs we may begin to make some progress to the benefit of nearly all our patients, the finances of the NHS, and society.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2010.

REFERENCE

  1. ↵
    1. Davies P,
    2. Garbutt G
    (2010) The exercise prescription. Br J Gen Pract 60(577):555–556.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. NHS Information Centre
    Health survey for England – 2008: physical activity and fitness. 2009, www.ic.nhs.uk/statistics-and-data-collections/health-and-lifestyles-related-surveys/health-survey-for-england/health-survey-for-england–2008-physical-activity-and-fitness (accessed 9 Aug 2010).
  3. ↵
    1. Troiano RP,
    2. Berrigan D,
    3. Dodd KW,
    4. et al.
    (2008) Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 40(1):181–188.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. ↵
    1. Weiler R,
    2. Stamatakis E,
    3. Blair S
    (2010) Should health policy focus on physical activity rather than obesity? Yes. BMJ 340:c2603.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    1. Stamatakis E,
    2. Weiler R
    (2010) Prevention of cardiovascular disease: why do we neglect the most potent intervention? Heart 96(4):261–262.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    1. O’Donovan G,
    2. Biddle S,
    3. Blazevich A,
    4. et al.
    (2010) The ABC of Physical Activity for Health: a consensus statement from the British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences. J Sports Sci 28(6):573–591.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Weiler R,
    2. Stamatakis E
    (2010) Physical activity in the UK: a unique crossroad? Br J Sports Med, [Epub ahead of print].
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 60 (578)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 60, Issue 578
September 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Physical activity promotion
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Physical activity promotion
Richard Weiler
British Journal of General Practice 2010; 60 (578): 694. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X515520

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Physical activity promotion
Richard Weiler
British Journal of General Practice 2010; 60 (578): 694. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X515520
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCE
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Two-tiered medicine: the increasing disparity in medical care in the UK
  • MRCGP Recorded Consultation Assessment — the hidden fourth construct
  • Prostate-specific antigen testing and opportunistic prostate cancer screening — CAP intervention
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Advertisement

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers
  • RCGP e-Portfolio

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7679
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2021 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242