Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Back Pages

GP commissioning consortia: is there a role for physician assistants in routine care?

Olumide Elegbe
British Journal of General Practice 2010; 60 (578): 704-705. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp10X515601
Olumide Elegbe
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

With the publication of the government's health White Paper,1 and the impending handover of commissioning to GPs, the future of family medicine, and indeed the NHS, is at a crossroads.

According to the White Paper, every GP will have to join a commissioning consortium by 2011/12; and primary care trusts (PCTs) will be abolished in 2013.1

Commissioning will take up a lot of GP time and doctors, who are already involved in patient care and management of their organisations and business, will have even less time to devote to patient care.

The leader of the British Medical Association and the General Practitioners Committee warned GPs earlier in the week of the extent of the task ahead; as the time required for commissioning will be substantial. The warning was accompanied by a gentle nudge towards hiring NHS managers instead of private sector consultants.2

Considering the diverse nature of the work currently undertaken by PCTs — all 152 of them — radical change to the way GPs currently work is essential for the new model to be successful.

Paul Charlson, a member of the Doctors for Reform steering committee and himself a GP, has warned of the need for a culture change in general practice in preparation of GP consortia.3

Dr Charlson warned that the burden will fall to a few GPs who are interested in commissioning, while other GPs will have to focus on more complex tasks.

This leaves a gap for the management of repetitive and so-called ‘low challenge’ tasks which GPs have to deal with.

Although repetitive and seemingly unchallenging, these cases still need to be dealt with for the improvement of the health of the general population. Also, this could potentially widen health inequality gaps with doctors working in areas of relatively higher deprivation whose practices are currently understaffed and could increase concerns about impending retirement of GPs from South Asia who are the ‘backbone of the medical labour force’ in inner city neighbourhoods.4

While it is still unclear what the final picture will be, it is worth considering ways to handle the gap in patient care which these proposed arrangements will almost certainly create. Physician assistants in primary care could offer a realistic solution to fill the gaps in care which will be created by the reorganisation of GP tasks.

In view of the responsibility that GPs will be taking for commissioning, the introduction of physician assistants into primary care would free up GP time to manage more complex cases, to mentor, supervise, to provide primary care leadership, to improve quality of care, and to focus on commissioning. An estimated 70–80% of tasks previously carried out only by physicians can be done by physician assistants at the same level of quality.5 Much of the burden of paperwork imposed on doctors may also be handed over to physician assistants. This fits the ethos of introducing physician assistant practice in the UK: the National Practitioner Programme, while active stated that the role was intended ‘to take over all the repetitive and protocol based work which doctors do’.6

The Physician Assistant

The shortage of doctors and expense of their training led to development of alternative health professionals to carry out routine and repetitive tasks under supervision of doctors. Physician assistants were licensed in the 1960s in the US mainly to expand capacity in primary care where doctors were often over-worked in rural and medically under-served areas.5,7,8

Graduates with a good science degree are offered training which comprises an intensive 2 year curriculum similar to a condensed traditional medical course.9

Conceptually within a ‘medical model’, the training for physician assistants aims for competency in history taking, examination, diagnosis, management, and referral. In the US physician assistants take a national certification exam to qualify, and have to be recertified by examinations every 6 years.5 Similarly, surgical care practitioners, who work as permanent members of the surgical team carrying out minor procedures and as surgeons’ assistants, were introduced in the UK in 1989.10 Physician assistants have been shown to provide patient care that is indistinguishable from the quality of care provided by physicians.8,11 As they have a smaller caseload, physician assistants are able to give more time to each individual,12,13 similar to the nurse practitioner, and high levels of patient satisfaction with physician assistants have been recorded in several studies.7,14

Physician assistants are regarded to be cost-effective as they reduce the workload of doctors at a lower cost.15 In one study in the US using physician assistants for regular visits (3–4 per week) to a nursing home (with supervision from physicians), the authors found reduced hospitalisation and medical costs compared with the routine policy of monthly physician visits.16 The physician assistant training programme attracts graduates previously under-utilised by the NHS, such as science graduates, those interested in working in health but not attracted to nurse training, and those who desire flexible working conditions.

In the US, applicants were initially predominantly men but women now comprise over 60% of working physician assistants. Physician assistants have been prepared to work in areas where GPs are difficult to recruit, and so could be directed to work in areas of deprivation as another step towards tackling health inequalities. Physician assistants could be commissioned by GPs to address inequalities in access to health care and ‘hard to reach’ groups that do not attend for chronic disease annual reviews and are not captured by the Quality and Outcomes Framework as they are reported as exceptions. The recruitment of physician assistants to more deprived areas, may inadvertently attract GPs to work there because of the reduced workload and better staff ratios, as they are able to devote more time to commissioning.

With radical reforms of the NHS, the introduction of these healthcare professionals has the potential to improve health outcomes and free up GP time to focus on commissioning.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2010.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    (2010) Department of Health. Equity and excellence: liberating the NHS (Department of Health, London) http://www.dh.gov.uk/prod_consum_dh/groups/dh_digitalassets/@dh/@en/@ps/documents/digitalasset/dh_117794.pdf (accessed 9 Aug 2010).
  2. ↵
    1. Gainsbury S
    (2010) BMA leader urges GPs to hire NHS managers rather than private companies. Health Serv J, 19 July: http://www.hsj.co.uk/news/primary-care/bma-leader-urges-gps-to-hire-nhs-managers-rather-than-private-companies/5017376.article (accessed 9 Aug 2010).
  3. ↵
    1. Ford S
    (2010) GP consortia will be a ‘minority’ interest. Health Serv J, 21 July: http://www.hsj.co.uk/5017350.article?referrer=e2 (accessed 9 Aug 2010).
  4. ↵
    1. Gavin M
    (2002) Physician assistants. Many general practitioners would welcome having physician assistants. BMJ 324(7339):735, [Letter] http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/extract/324/7339/735 (accessed 9 Aug 2010).
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    National Practitioner Programme 2006 – Recorded interview.
  6. ↵
    1. Buchan J,
    2. O'May F,
    3. Ball J
    (2007) New role, new country: introducing US physician assistants to Scotland. Hum Resour Health 5:13.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    1. Frary T
    (1996) A New Definition of ‘Physician Assistant’ J Am Acad Physician Assist 9:22–27.
    OpenUrl
  8. ↵
    1. Mittman DE,
    2. Cawley JF,
    3. Fenn WH
    (2002) Physician Assistants in the United States. BMJ 325:485–487.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    1. Hutchinson L,
    2. Marks T,
    3. Pittilo M
    (2001) The physician assistant: would the US model meet the needs of the NHS? BMJ 323:1244–1247.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    1. Abood A
    (2005) Surgical Care Practitioners. BMJ Careers, 227, 26 Nov.
  11. ↵
    1. White GL Jr.,
    2. Davis AM
    (1999) Physician Assistants as partners in physician directed care. Southern Med J 92:956–960.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. ↵
    1. Wilson IB Landon BE,
    2. Hirschhom LR,
    3. et al.
    (2005) Quality of HIV Care provided by nurse practitioners, physician assistants and physicians. Ann Int Med 143(10):729–737.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    1. Horrocks S,
    2. Anderson E,
    3. Salisbury C
    (2002) Systematic review of whether nurse practitioners working in primary care can provide equivalent care to doctors. BMJ 324:819–823.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    1. Stewart A,
    2. Catanzaro
    (2005) Can Physician Assistants be Effective in the UK? Clin Med 5:344–348.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    1. Chopra M,
    2. Munro S,
    3. Lavis JN,
    4. et al.
    (2008) Effects of policy options for human resources for health: an analysis of systematic reviews. Lancet 371:668–674.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    1. Ackermann RJ,
    2. Kemle KA
    (1998) The effect of a physician assistant on the hospitalisation of nursing home residents. J Am Geriatr Soc 46:610–614.
    OpenUrlPubMed
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 60 (578)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 60, Issue 578
September 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
GP commissioning consortia: is there a role for physician assistants in routine care?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
GP commissioning consortia: is there a role for physician assistants in routine care?
Olumide Elegbe
British Journal of General Practice 2010; 60 (578): 704-705. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X515601

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
GP commissioning consortia: is there a role for physician assistants in routine care?
Olumide Elegbe
British Journal of General Practice 2010; 60 (578): 704-705. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X515601
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • The Physician Assistant
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

The Back Pages

  • How to protect general practice from child protection
  • Who Is My Patient?
  • Working with vulnerable families in deprived areas
Show more The Back Pages

Essay

  • ‘Heartsink’ patients in general practice: a defining paper, its impact, and psychodynamic potential
  • Second thoughts about the NHS reforms
  • Good enough care?
Show more Essay

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

Tweets by @BJGPjournal

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242