Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Back Pages

Kennedy Report

Mike Fitzpatrick
British Journal of General Practice 2010; 60 (581): 939. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp10X544195
Mike Fitzpatrick
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

‘As one senior GP put it to me, “some GPs don't even know how to hold a baby”1

In compiling his review of children's services commissioned by the NHS Executive, Professor Sir Ian Kennedy tells us that he ‘travelled around England and spoke to a great many people’.1 Indeed, an appendix lists hundreds of authorities he consulted and institutions he visited. Yet, although he has a great deal to say about GPs and general practice, he seems not to have set foot in a single surgery and to have spoken to only one GP — Professor Steve Field, the then chair of the Royal College of General Practitioners. Professor Kennedy does not say whether Professor Field was ‘the senior GP’ whose spirit of professional self-abasement helpfully provided him with the pithy comment cited above that so accurately reflects his own contemptuous view of GPs' skills in child care.

In his introduction, Professor Kennedy reminds readers that it is 30 years since he first ‘lamented the state of health and health care of children’.2 Many will also recall how this academic lawyer used the Reith Lectures to launch a bitter polemic, endorsing a ‘consumerist challenge’ to self-regulation and promoting an individualist gospel of health promotion — an agenda he has pursued with ever-increasing government backing over the intervening decades.

Professor Kennedy provides a striking illustration of the ambivalence of the political elite towards the medical profession. On the one hand they are envious that doctors retain the status and authority that other professions (such as politicians, lawyers, and clergymen) have lost; on the other, they nurture a burning resentment that leads them to strive to drag doctors into the gutter with the rest of them.

The Kennedy Report reflects the familiar view that GPs hold the answer to every problem of society. In relation to children, they must become ‘not so much the “gatekeepers” of the past, more the “navigators” of the future’.1 At the same time, Kennedy claims that GPs have ‘little or no experience of paediatrics’, they ‘lack the confidence to assess and treat children effectively’,1 they provide a poor service to disabled children and fail to attend child protection case conferences.

The solution to GPs' supposed deficiencies in paediatrics is familiar: more training. This proposal is supported by the claim that ‘in many parts of the country, 40–50% will have had no formal paediatric/child health training’.1 This rigorous statistic, typical of the poor quality of the evidence on which this report is based, is backed with a reference to an unpublished survey carried out by the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health.

In his recommendations, Professor Kennedy recycles every cliché and platitude of past reports. Here is a typical combination of empty rhetoric and wishful thinking: ‘The connections and interactions of the various services can be choreographed so as to make them truly complementary. Savings in terms of greater efficiency, early intervention and the avoidance of duplication will be immediately realised.’1

The enduring mystery of the Kennedy Report is why the former chair of the RCGP should have allowed his name to remain on a document that is so prejudiced and ill-informed about general practice that it can make no useful contribution towards the real problems of providing better health care for children.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, 2010.

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    Department of Health. Getting it right for children and young people: overcoming cultural barriers in the NHS so as to meet their needs, A review by Professor Sir Ian Kennedy. http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_119445 (accessed 5 Nov 2010).
  2. ↵
    1. Kennedy I
    (1981) The unmasking of medicine (Allen and Unwin, London).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 60 (581)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 60, Issue 581
December 2010
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Kennedy Report
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Kennedy Report
Mike Fitzpatrick
British Journal of General Practice 2010; 60 (581): 939. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X544195

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Kennedy Report
Mike Fitzpatrick
British Journal of General Practice 2010; 60 (581): 939. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp10X544195
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

The Back Pages

  • The ethics of listening and responding to patients' narratives: implications for practice
  • How big is your society?
  • Evidence-based medicine and Web 2.0: friend or foe?
Show more The Back Pages

Essay

  • ‘Heartsink’ patients in general practice: a defining paper, its impact, and psychodynamic potential
  • Second thoughts about the NHS reforms
  • Good enough care?
Show more Essay

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242