Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
Letter

Author's response

Graham Watt
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (585): 294. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X567225
Graham Watt
University of Glasgow, on behalf of the Deep End Steering Group. E-mail:
Roles: Professor of General Practice
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: Graham.Watt@glasgow.ac.uk
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

What is the NHS for? Steven and Jackson give several examples, based on ‘idyllic, rural’ north-east Fife, including counselling for patients no longer able to afford private medicine, home visiting across the country miles, providing extra support for older patients whose offspring live far way, and the general increased needs of older patients.1

All these types of issue, variously reflecting needs and demands, can keep GPs busy, but in the same way that the purpose of the NHS is not just to pay staff, neither is it just to be sure that staff are busy.

It is no news to anyone that increasing age is the main driver of consultation rates in general practice, whether in affluent or deprived areas. Successive GP contracts have been weighted to reflect this. But while GPs serving affluent areas have to cope with the multiple morbidity of ageing, GPs serving very deprived areas are dealing with higher levels of multiple morbidity and social complexity at every age after childhood. GP contracts and workload studies have taken little account of this, partly because workload can only increase so much, and after that, both practitioners and patients have to adapt to what is possible. The maldistribution of GP manpower in the UK, that is worse in England than in Scotland, is an established fact and not a hypothesis.2 The ‘Deep End’ title implies the consequent depth of unmet need within everyday general practice in deprived areas.

Many of the issues that concern general practice in the Deep End are similar to those affecting all practices, including the challenges of ageing populations. One reason for focusing on the Deep End is that life expectancy is unnecessarily short in very deprived areas, and as Julian Tudor Hart has shown, well-organised, mainstream general practice can make an important difference. General practice could be better supported to improve health and narrow health inequalities in very deprived areas – not just a ‘laudable aim’, but a major policy objective of all political parties. This is not the only purpose of the NHS, as Dr Steven and Professor Jackson describe, but the case deserves a hearing, and respect.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, April 2011

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Steven K,
    2. Jackson C
    (2011) GPs at the Deep End [letter]. Br J Gen Pract 61(585):293–294.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. House of Commons Committee of Public Accounts
    Tackling inequalities in life expectancy in areas with the worst health and deprivation. Third Report of Session 2010–2011 (The Stationery Office, London) HC 470.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 61 (585)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 61, Issue 585
April 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Article Alerts
Or,
sign in or create an account with your email address
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Author's response
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Author's response
Graham Watt
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (585): 294. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X567225

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Author's response
Graham Watt
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (585): 294. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X567225
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Incidence of cow’s milk protein allergy
  • Encouraging medical students to pursue general practice
  • Alerts in electronic medical records in primary care to promote colorectal cancer screening
Show more Letter

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242