Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
British Journal of General Practice

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
The Back Pages

Who Is My Patient?

Christopher George Tiley
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (585): 297. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X567298
Christopher George Tiley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

I work in a three-partner practice with about 5100 patients. We have open lists so any of these could be under my care and therefore qualify as mine. Many of these never come to see me, and others will be looked after by colleagues from other practices if they fall ill out of hours. In the same way, I cover patients outside my practice area on weekend shifts and in my hospital work in the local neurology department. Consultants usually see local patients but they may receive referrals from out of the area or even abroad if they have an international reputation. Many newly arrived immigrants have access to our health system, while I have treated patients during overseas work in Afghanistan, Africa, and New Zealand. We all share a responsibility for people who fall ill when we are the nearest medical attendant, even if we are on holiday! The last time this happened to me I looked after a Frenchman having a heart attack in California.

Hippocrates wrote that:

‘I will use my power to help the sick to the best of my ability and judgment.’

As a GP, how should I interpret this worthy piece of advice? It can be easy to be territorial and develop a fixation with geography – our practice boundaries, the scope of our proposed consortium, our national borders – but the previous paragraph shows that how we classify someone as one of our patients is much more fluid. If we define ‘the sick’ as those within our sphere of influence whose health could be improved by simple, cost-effective interventions, we suddenly have a global population to consider.

The latter part of that definition is easy to justify; inexpensive ‘horizontal’ programmes of primary care have the potential to save and improve millions of lives in poor countries. In one analysis of preventable deaths in children across 42 countries, it was estimated that 63% of deaths could have been prevented by fully implemented primary care.1 Mosquito nets cost roughly £1 each, while a basket of simple drugs to treat worms, vitamin A deficiency, and trachoma costs just 50 pence per child. Compare this with the ceiling of £30 000 per quality-adjusted life year used in assessments of medical interventions by NICE.

What GPs in the UK may find harder to digest is the idea that such people are within our sphere of influence, especially when we have so many domestic issues to concern us. We may not be fully aware of the benefits that primary care can bring to health systems, but there is abundant evidence of this; besides the paper from Jones et al,1 Starfield's summary from 2005 is compelling,2 a recent editorial in the BJGP may help provoke discussion around how to improve health outcomes in poor countries,3 while low cost primary care expansion has just proved highly successful (again) in Brazil.4

The ‘15 by 2015’ campaign lobbies for a larger share of aid to be spent on the expansion of primary care through so called ‘horizontal’ programmes (these also build infrastructure for other services) rather than expensive ‘vertical’ ones which concentrate on single diseases. It is supported by agencies including the European Forum for Primary Care and WONCA (you can sign their petition online at http://www.15by2015.org or lobby the RCGP to support the campaign). Of course there are many more agencies that aim to provide clean water, support for farmers, microcredit, and other useful interventions but this one is taking our specialty and trying to spread it more widely and where it is most needed.

Unlike Hippocrates, we are developing a clear view of poverty and health inequality around the world. As doctors we are in a good position to advocate for improved global healthcare for ‘the sick’: we should be proud of what primary care can achieve, and encourage the development of systems abroad to improve the health of those patients whom we may never see, but who would benefit from our efforts all the same.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, April 2011

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Jones G,
    2. Steketee RW,
    3. Black RE,
    4. et al.
    (2003) How many child deaths can we prevent this year? Lancet 362:65–71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    1. Starfield B,
    2. Shi L,
    3. Macinko J
    (2005) Contribution of primary care to health systems and health. Milbank Q 83(3):457–502.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    1. De Maeseneer J,
    2. Twagirumukiza M
    (2010) The contribution of primary health care to global health. Br J Gen Pract 60(581):875–876.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. ↵
    1. Harris M
    (2010) Brazil's family health programme. BMJ 341:c4945. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c4945.
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 61 (585)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 61, Issue 585
April 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Who Is My Patient?
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
Who Is My Patient?
Christopher George Tiley
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (585): 297. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X567298

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
Who Is My Patient?
Christopher George Tiley
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (585): 297. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X567298
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

The Back Pages

  • The ethics of listening and responding to patients' narratives: implications for practice
  • How big is your society?
  • Evidence-based medicine and Web 2.0: friend or foe?
Show more The Back Pages

Viewpoint

  • The NHS: have the rivets popped?
  • Bring Hippocrates to the people and save the NHS
  • Getting the swagger back into general practice
Show more Viewpoint

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

Tweets by @BJGPjournal

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242