Skip to main content

Main menu

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers

User menu

  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals
  • RCGP
    • BJGP for RCGP members
    • BJGP Open
    • RCGP eLearning
    • InnovAIT Journal
    • Jobs and careers
  • Subscriptions
  • Alerts
  • Log in
  • Follow bjgp on Twitter
  • Visit bjgp on Facebook
  • Blog
  • Listen to BJGP podcast
  • Subscribe BJGP on YouTube
British Journal of General Practice
Intended for Healthcare Professionals

Advanced Search

  • HOME
  • ONLINE FIRST
  • CURRENT ISSUE
  • ALL ISSUES
  • AUTHORS & REVIEWERS
  • SUBSCRIBE
  • BJGP LIFE
  • MORE
    • About BJGP
    • Conference
    • Advertising
    • eLetters
    • Alerts
    • Video
    • Audio
    • Librarian information
    • Resilience
    • COVID-19 Clinical Solutions
LETTERS

How to protect general practice from child protection

Janice Allister
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (586): 326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp11X572373
Janice Allister
RCGP Child Safeguarding Lead, Bishop's Lodging, Peterborough, PE1 1YA E-mail:
Roles: Chair Primary Care Child Safeguarding Forum
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: janice.allister@gmail.com
  • Article
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF
Loading

Mike Fitzpatrick's views1 are outdated. He begins his article by mentioning the tragic cases of Victoria Climbié and Peter Connelly (Baby P): in both cases the GPs were found to be negligent. He attempts to undermine the whole system of safeguarding. It is a cynical denial of what is a very real problem.

He is right to say that we should not be driven by media hysteria; that some cases will always be missed; and that attention is needed to contentious issues such as referral forms, case conferences in surgery hours, and impenetrable minutes. The Common Assessment Framework (CAF) referral form that he describes, for which, by the way, parental consent is usually required, is under Eileen Munro's beady eye2 at the moment. The CAF process was intended to help early intervention and is evidence based.3

He advocates that community paediatricians should mediate between GPs and the child protection system, but referrals are rarely straightforward. Safeguarding issues are uncovered in the process of investigating and treating other conditions, including adult ones, and the child is not complaining. Community paediatricians do not always have the same contact with children and their families or know them well.

I am most disturbed by Mike Fitzpatrick's explanation of the nature of general practice. He describes our job as simply attempting to diagnose and treat people when we see them episodically and infrequently. He says we should not ‘adopt the role of social worker, psychologist, police, or priest’. But we are to get to know our patients, their families, and their circumstances. We are to understand and care for them as whole people, not just to diagnose and treat their episodic conditions. We are GPs; gatekeepers to all the specialist treatments the NHS has to offer; and called to know, love, and care for people in the context in which they find themselves, at every stage of their lives. When a case conference is needed it would be farcical without the GP present and playing a major part.

  • © British Journal of General Practice, May 2011

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Fitzpatrick M
    (2011) How to protect general practice from child protection. Br J Gen Pract 61(585):299.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. ↵
    1. Munro E
    (2011) The Munro Review of Child Protection, part one: a systems analysis. Feb www.education.gov.uk/munroreview/ (accessed 7 Apr 2011).
  3. ↵
    1. Children's Workforce Development Council, Common assessment framework (CAF)
    (2011) (Children's Workforce Development Council, Leeds) http://www.cwdcouncil.org.uk/caf (accessed 7 Apr 2011).
Back to top
Previous ArticleNext Article

In this issue

British Journal of General Practice: 61 (586)
British Journal of General Practice
Vol. 61, Issue 586
May 2011
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for recommending British Journal of General Practice.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person to whom you are recommending the page knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
How to protect general practice from child protection
(Your Name) has forwarded a page to you from British Journal of General Practice
(Your Name) thought you would like to see this page from British Journal of General Practice.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Citation Tools
How to protect general practice from child protection
Janice Allister
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (586): 326. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X572373

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

Share
How to protect general practice from child protection
Janice Allister
British Journal of General Practice 2011; 61 (586): 326. DOI: 10.3399/bjgp11X572373
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
  • Mendeley logo Mendeley

Jump to section

  • Top
  • Article
    • REFERENCES
  • Info
  • eLetters
  • PDF

More in this TOC Section

  • Jacquet erosive dermatitis in an era of ‘going green’
  • The global primary care crisis
  • Self-ageism among older rural people
Show more Letters

Related Articles

Cited By...

Intended for Healthcare Professionals

BJGP Life

BJGP Open

 

@BJGPjournal's Likes on Twitter

 
 

British Journal of General Practice

NAVIGATE

  • Home
  • Current Issue
  • All Issues
  • Online First
  • Authors & reviewers

RCGP

  • BJGP for RCGP members
  • BJGP Open
  • RCGP eLearning
  • InnovAiT Journal
  • Jobs and careers

MY ACCOUNT

  • RCGP members' login
  • Subscriber login
  • Activate subscription
  • Terms and conditions

NEWS AND UPDATES

  • About BJGP
  • Alerts
  • RSS feeds
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

AUTHORS & REVIEWERS

  • Submit an article
  • Writing for BJGP: research
  • Writing for BJGP: other sections
  • BJGP editorial process & policies
  • BJGP ethical guidelines
  • Peer review for BJGP

CUSTOMER SERVICES

  • Advertising
  • Contact subscription agent
  • Copyright
  • Librarian information

CONTRIBUTE

  • BJGP Life
  • eLetters
  • Feedback

CONTACT US

BJGP Journal Office
RCGP
30 Euston Square
London NW1 2FB
Tel: +44 (0)20 3188 7400
Email: journal@rcgp.org.uk

British Journal of General Practice is an editorially-independent publication of the Royal College of General Practitioners
© 2023 British Journal of General Practice

Print ISSN: 0960-1643
Online ISSN: 1478-5242